Who will

20:37 by Editor · 0 Post a comment on AAWR

Do political sands shift or are they forced to, is all merely smoke and mirrors, subterfuge and deceit, are old alliances discarded as just so much dross, whilst new, even peculiar ones are formed. Can Judaism, with it’s emphasise on group survival at any cost really seek alliance with Christianity, can a group so mindful of their difference, ever seek comrades from the out group. Can a group, ever hope to be placed on equal-footing by such an ethnocentric group, the proposition is absurd, ridiculous in the extreme, yet groups of all persuasions and none, jump around to Jewry’s call. They leap blindly off the precipice of stupidity, with not a care, not a thought, such is the case with our (sic) current crop of nationalists, the war currently raging is not for us, we the people of the west, it is not to protect our values, our way of life.

Already our way of life has gone under, submerged in a mere of profligacy and narcissism, the fight therefore is between Judaism, capitalism, liberalism, socialism and traditionalist Islam, Christianity having fallen to leftist dogma some time ago. One could be forgiven for thinking that, Islam was the most threatening the most awful yet I beg to differ, I chose not to walk along the road others do, led upon such a journey by the puppet masters. Islam faces attack just as we have in the past, at one time Christianity repelled both Islam and the money lenders, it was at one time our shield against cultural invasion, regrettably we no longer have much of a culture, we are laid bare like a grisly cadaver, easy pickings for carrion and pick they do by the millions, invading our countries and feasting on our remains. Until one day the feast will be over, the west will be bled dry, then the price must be paid as a new order dawns for the world, authoritarianism of such magnitude shall envelope the world and all shall kneel, caught then in a web of gargantuan monstrosity. 

You see regardless of all they tell you we are all different, all totally unalike, this very difference makes for humanity, seek to equalise us and we become enslaved scared to speak, scared to act, scared finally to think, at this stage we are willing hostages to our dire fortune. Islam has the right to exist, it is a culture, a way of life for millions of people, attacking Islam is not the act of a nationalist, not the act of the intellectual, it is the act of a fool, led blindfolded to their extermination. I as a nationalist have not a care for Islam should it remain in the countries of its creation, yet I must stand should it cross to the west however, whilst standing I cannot disparage this religion, fall into line as so many on the purported right have. 

Islam must be doing something right if it worries them so, if they with their owned press attack it so constantly, perhaps it is the final creed to crush, the final bonding philosophy to negate, the family has fallen, faith has fallen and nationalism has fallen. The west is a dying empty shell, so the monster turns its hateful gaze to the east, to tyrannise another people, to wreck their way of life and enforce “democracy” upon them, is it any wonder they fight, what right have the west to impose their dogma upon others, would you not fight, if chance presented, I would. Or do you live under the illusion that democracy works that, each voice is heard and they act in our name, when pray tell have they ever listened to the people, perhaps in the founding of America but when other. 

Democracy is a lie, a sham, a ruse, trickery of magnitude, nothing more, yet it bedazzles the masses as they play with their trinkets, as unaware as an idiot savant, able to function yet never knowing why. All the while they lead a merry dance and their show goes down a storm, whilst we sit unaware, evil encroaches, tyranny tightens its grip and the dark state grows, it incrementally takes your very liberty yet you sit there wordlessly, it threatens your children’s future yet you offer no contestation. In order to win a war, propaganda is all, if one can summon up a demon, create anger and direct it at a given target, then the soldier fights harder and the civilian resists, the protagonist fights your just war believing it is theirs, you have won, nothing can defeat force of will. 

In order to present good propaganda one must own the channels of communication, be able to drown out the voices of dissent, make of them but a dull echo, a far-away sound almost unheard, a vague tremor of disapproval, of warning, beseeching a people lost to the tune of the noisy piper. That is why the right is losing, purely because we make no noise, we huddle together bemoaning our fate, yet never form a mass, never create the crescendo needed and so we fail and fail we will, until our light goes out. The left have us outgunned, our troops cut off one to the other, small groups form but are always defeated, always succumbing to the greater mass, yet our message is of salvation and perhaps to redemption, should we deliver it to the masses then egalitarianism falls and the left run hounded by our truth. 

The message of nationalism is not hate, is not the crude behaviour of the thug, we seek no dominance over others, yet no equality either, we recognise truths now forbidden, now illegal. I can never hope to run as the Negro runs; typically Negroes have more speed over short distances, on average whites do better academically, this is a truth, suppressed it may be, yet it is a truth nevertheless. In my country whites commit more crimes of burglary and blacks more street crime, this again is a truth, yet leftists would have you believe that, it is hateful to acknowledge those truths. They insist that recognition of difference is hate, is it not more hateful to enforce equality, force the Negro into an unfair competition with whites, surely true respect between the races can only come by recognising difference and responding benevolently to expected result. 

For instance, sickle cell anaemia affects individuals predominantly from sub-Saharan Africa caused by a mutation of a nucleotide, which is the building block of Deoxyribonucleic acid or what most people refer to as DNA, DNA of course, creates a polymer which is in essence a repeated set of instructions held by a chemical bond called a covalent bond, the encoding instructions are held by an ester bond holding four Nucleotide bases, now all of this is quite simply read as a code, what is referred to as our genetic code or standard genetic code, this contains most of our unique genetic make up, contrary to leftist thought, our uniqueness. In the case of sickle cell anaemia the disease is inherited, although the chances of suffering from it are considerably higher or compounded, should both mother and father be a carrier. It is possible to suffer no negative affects should it be passed on by one parent, yet the genetic coding thus inherited may possibly, should circumstance conspire, cause immense suffering to ones own offspring. 

This disease is by its very nature racially specific, in that it affects unambiguous racial groups, yet we are led to believe we are all equal, that skin colour aside, we are genetically similar this is a lie. Now given as I stated above that, one can live quite healthily whilst carrying the gene if inherited from one parent, isn’t it a fact that, in promoting miscegenation, one in effect is merely establishing a genetic defect within a wider host population. In evolutionary terms we are weakening a strong gene pool, with as yet unknowable results, it could be that the white gene wins out or it may be that from a coding standpoint the stronger non-white gene triumphs. In any event this is not just a social experiment, it has far greater consequences, we are effectively thwarting natures grand design, certainly we could end up with a genetically stronger individual however, if we do not the Caucasian has been sacrificed for naught. Observations on a more superficial although highly relevant level would indicate that, we are creating a dysgenic individual, rather than a hardy hybrid, currently we are sacrificing intelligence and altruistic behavioural processes for speed and lawlessness, there is nothing to indicate as yet that the process now undertaken gains mankind in anyway. 

It would seem rather the reverse, yes it is quite true that there are outstandingly intelligent Negroes, just as there are outstanding Caucasian sprinters however, overall this is indubitably not the case, what will they do after they have killed off the white man, as average intelligence will lessen with each successive generation, we will in effect be returning to primitivism. Of course such a population will be easier to control, so a group not given to sharing their DNA may find that finally they have achieved the long held dream of hegemony. Because the strong savage can always be defeated, by the weaker more intelligent opponent with a superior arsenal, in this way a minority group can by force of arms, control a much larger group. Slavery is always with us it merely takes a different name and don’t we all work for the money men, those individuals that live off the labour of their fellow man, the future holds no different a prospect. 

Let me tell you something, there are good and bad in all races, there are some white men who are beneath contempt, low, mean, quite awful individuals, loathsome persons and there are some negroes that are honest, considerate, truthful, law-abiding fellows however, we must take the average and on that basis egalitarianism has no basis, it is a fallacy. Things are changing of course the white man is catching up, humans are social animals, evolutionarily predisposed to crave group acceptance, so if alien interlopers are introduced into a group, promoted above the old group then incrementally the group as a whole, changes in behaviour in order to match the group favourites or as individuals, seek to remain part of the group’s hierocracy. The first thing one must do in order to foster change is to break down the group, one cannot simply introduce the interloper as this creates hostility, one must first break up the familial unit. 

Social groups place great price on attraction, the higher one climbs in the social group the more scope for mates, so firstly one must change the status quo, one must make the interloper more attractive than the current group leader. Once the interloper becomes more attractive in the eyes of potential mates the deed is done, the dethroned erstwhile group leader/leaders face an uphill task. The group dynamic therefore changes, then of course regardless of the actions of the erstwhile leader/leaders, the interloper has mated within the group, becoming now genetically embedded within the group, the group therefore can never become as it was without expelling both the interloper and its mate/mates and beginning anew. The trick here therefore, is to rescue the group before all of its branches have genetically altered, this can be achieved only by genetic isolation from the interlopers and high group birth-rates, the exact opposite of current thinking. 
You see we save the whale, run around the planet saving this and saving that yet take little time to save ourselves, it seems that every other animal, culture and life-form bar the Caucasian has a right to exist, a right to its own territorial and genetic borders but if we do not save ourselves who will. 14








 


Related Posts by Categories



Post a comment on AAWR

0 Responses to "Who will"

Post a Comment

We welcome contributions from all sides of the debate, at AAWR comment is free, AAWR may edit and/or delete your comments if abusive, threatening, illegal or libellous according to our understanding of, no emails will be published. Your comments may be published on other nationalist media sites worldwide.