Violence became the order of the day, women were depicted as sluttish, lacking in morality, in fact television depicted morality and manners as out-dated and old fashioned, repeating the evil, until this belief became widespread amongst the young, lasting even until the present day. The older generation began to loathe all that came out of America, for it seemed that nothing good did, for our part, morals had slipped within society and this showed in our own television output, although to some extend, not to quite the same degree as the American output, we had to wait a decade or so to catch up. The older generation still sat down to watch the old black and white movies, (they still do) the women captivated by the splendour, whilst the men gripped by the courage and patriotism, for them the old Hollywood held sway, whilst the young drowned in a torrent of evil. Music to had changed, now corruption seeped from everywhere, the assault on the west had begun in earnest, the left relentlessly breaking down societies barriers, led by, on the face of it, America, America became thee enemy, to all we hold dear. Now when men spoke of America, it was with a bitterness I had never heard before, with an anger I had never experienced, the people began to associate America with immorality, violence and corruption, it has to be said they still do, even though my own country pumps out similar corruption.
In my short life-time, I have witnessed personally, America go from perhaps the most admired country on the planet to the most hated, from common man to intellectual, all revile America. How can such a change occur, how can a country slump so far in esteem within so short a time, how is it possible, this country no longer apple-pie, manners and courage, now just barbarity, immorality and iniquity and yet the old America is still so loved, still revered, still holds a place in all our hearts, whilst the masses loathe the new America. There is something quite strange, something I cannot put my finger on, an ethereal bridge that links my country with America, a bond even now unbroken that predisposes British men, to face combat allied with American men. Perhaps it is that unspoken acknowledgement that, we cannot turn our back on our own, that in the final analysis we cannot help but stand with them, it seems we cannot desert our post, it is a quite strange phenomenon, knowing that America commits so much wrong yet being unable to turn away. We are able to recognise and voice our bitterness yet unlike others we are compelled to stand, I can never understand it, perhaps I never will, yet I have always known it and I believe that all British men do, I have seen men made so angry, so enraged, mouthing their anger at America, yet all would lay this anger aside to face a common enemy. I remember as a child a member of my family who fought in the war, always disparaging the “yanks”, yet whilst watching the news, should any story involve attacking those self-same “yanks”, he would almost leap from his chair enraged, ready once again to fight at their side.
It is as if we British have the unique capacity, to look behind the façade present day America presents and see a tiny bit of ourselves, not much mind but enough to recognise, enough to take side with. Sometimes I wish we were not that way, that we British could remain independent, not be dragged into wars that are not in our interest, yet even this argument holds no water, given that most wars are not in Americas interest either, America hasn’t worked in its own interest for a very long time and even then but for a moment. I believe that the intense anger we British feel, is because we cannot understand, cannot understand how a country so genetically linked to our own; can act in such an anti-European manner, by imposing its anti-western practices on us. We recognise that much of our ills stemmed from America, there is a common saying in Britain “what happens in America happens here” and for the most part it has proved correct, political correctness has and is ravaging Europe, imported from America to destroy its genetic birthplace. The genie is out of the bottle and continues to run rampant, destroying thousands of years of European culture and genotype, America had a problem from the very beginning, having to hold on to its Europeanism through force, we of course had no such problem, this being distinct from empire, a different proposition altogether. No, America from its very beginning contained a genetic mix, a mix that although separate existed nonetheless, they as with South Africa had no other recourse but to use legalisation and enforcement to prevent irreversible admixture.
Both situations required continuous attention, for if not, racial amalgamation could be the only result, in both circumstances the non-white populace, would exhibit envy towards white societal achievement, which would inexorably lead to a demand for same. It is at this point that serious consideration should have been taken, if one equalises a potential competitor, especially one of superior number, then the end result is of course eventual defeat, which is of course what happened with South Africa and is happening with America. One cannot be liberal and maintain an adequate defence, defence by its very nature is group specific, America on its present course cannot and will not win ownership will simply change from white to non-white, whilst the name will remain the same the true America will have vanished for ever. Yet America remains the greatest threat to freedom this world has ever known, its polices and behaviours present as not only a threat to citizens of other countries but an immense and growing threat to Americans themselves. Whilst many Americans live under the illusion of freedom, America spreads its tentacles around the world and around its nation; it seeks as does the EU, a one world government that, keeps its citizenry in line by stealth, menace and coercion. It uses the completely erroneous threat of terrorism to imprison freedom; it is for this reason, I believe that territorial nationalism has failed and will continue to fail, nationalism must by necessity, become a defender of culture and genotype rather than merely territory. It must I believe, become a global phenomenon, to equal the global threat that presently threatens us all, we cannot hope to regain control of our countries standing alone.
It is pointless to endeavour to protect soil above race, any race can live upon soil however, it is only race that makes particular civilisations the white race and the non-white race, make completely different civilisations given their distinctive differences. Each can and do make a society however, both function differently, that is not to say any are superior just that each works according to the genotype that created them, it may be perfectly fine for one to remain more primitive, should the genotype in question remain at a more primordial stage. Races develop differently, because they are different, who are we to say that is wrong, to question nature’s grand design, it is we, we nationalists that truly seek to preserve natures diversity, whilst leftists as is their way, completely turn truth on its head and assert that it is they. Nationalism must move from country specific activism to global activism, become a global movement, instead of languishing impotently in never-never land, we must consider ourselves preservationists, because that is precisely what we are, forced to preserve what is left rather then fashion as yet our new tomorrow. The gravest threat rests not with Islam but with our governments and those that control them, our governments submit to a force other than the people, therefore we must consider them the enemy, our first duty is to our people and those to come.
Now in saying that America is the gravest threat to freedom, this cannot and should not be used by anti- American factions, as it is the government of America and the policies it follows that is the enemy, not the American people, America or those of European descent are dying, as America succumbs as we to non-white birth-rates. Currently we are all involved in the extinction lottery, which country will be first, which country will wake up one morning minority white, all hope for the future gone, to me all white countries are equally precious and each has the absolute right to exist as nature intended. Try and look behind the face America presents, peer through the fog of deceit and you may see as I do, a besieged and bewildered white, looking as we for freedom, betrayed to by their government, a government obsessed with power and control, contend to allow its people to die. True America is still there but only just, clinging on, falling into the great abyss, one day tyranny will have conquered freedom and each country will experience living under a supra-national government. A government that monitors the movements and actions of the individual, the freedoms we enjoy now, such as the internet will be heavily censored and dissent will be a memory, never again shall any country have autonomy, never again the individual freedom, It is our duty to strive against this, to fight again for all our tomorrows. 14
How America is snooping on YOU ... and may soon be snooping a whole lot more
Dutch Liberal MEP Sophie In’t Veld was becoming irritated. Whenever she tried to board a flight in America – something she does several times each year – she was delayed by special security checks, subjected to questioning, additional searches of her bags and screening for explosives.
‘No one has ever accused me of involvement with terrorism or organised crime,’ In’t Veld said. ‘So I tried to discover why I was being singled out.’
Security expert In’t Veld, 41, wrote to three US government departments – State, Justice and Homeland Security – asking what they had on her in their files.
She especially wanted to know whether she had unjustly been deemed ‘high-risk’ under a scheme known as ATS, the Automated Targeting System.
It is a secret computer database whose conclusions can, under American law, be shared with a wide range of US and foreign government agencies and in some cases, employers.
Despite invoking America’s Freedom of Information Act, In‘t Veld got nowhere. Last week, she filed a US lawsuit, the first of its kind, demanding access to her records.
‘They say there are means of redress if US agencies hold damaging but inaccurate information about you,’ she said. ‘They don’t seem to work.’
Her case comes at a critical juncture. Since the start of this year, operating almost entirely beneath the public radar, the US Government has been making a concerted, multi-faceted push for unrestricted access to vast volumes of personal data held by governments on this side of the Atlantic.
What the US is after goes far beyond the ability to make requests case by case. They seek the ability to go on electronic fishing expeditions among British and other European databases held by law enforcement, immigration, financial and other official bodies – without even having to inform the databases’ custodians, let alone their subjects.
Some of this information – misleading police intelligence reports based on malicious hearsay, for example – might well turn out to have much more serious consequences than whatever titbit is responsible for inconveniencing Ms In’t Veld at airports.
Theoretically, it could lead to the extradition of British subjects to face criminal trial in America on the basis of unverified information derived from UK files, even in cases where authorities in Britain do not consider prosecution justified.
The 2003 Extradition Act has already made American extradition requests effectively immune to legal challenge, by removing any need for a prima facie case.
Last week Statewatch, the civil liberties monitoring group, obtained a copy of the final report of a group of senior US and European Union officials – the ‘High Level Contact Group on information sharing and privacy and personal data protection’.
Supposedly, its job was to agree some international standards to ensure the rights of EU citizens will remain protected under agreements to make European data available to America. In practice, these safeguards look alarmingly weak.
The report says the Americans want instant information from EU members’ databases for ‘the prevention, detection, suppression, investigation or prosecution of any criminal offence’, as well as ‘non-criminal judicial or administrative proceedings’ – in other words, pretty much anything.
It is difficult to read the report’s final section without feeling chilled. There is, for example, no prohibition on supplying details of someone’s ethnic origins, political, religious or philosophical beliefs, or personal information about health or sexual life.
Confidential data transferred to America under the terms of the document could also include details of personal investments, bank and credit-card spending.
All information could be disseminated to US agencies, and in some circumstances, to third countries.
There must, the report promises, be ‘independent oversight’. Yet it accepts that, sometimes, decisions could be taken by machines.
For example, a computerised warning making it impossible to board an aircraft might be issued because a piece of American software determined a person posed a threat.
The report says such ‘automated decisions’ can be taken ‘without human involvement’, as long as there are ‘appropriate safeguards in place, including the possibility to obtain human intervention’.
‘In the real world, such protection is meaningless,’ said Tony Bunyan, Statewatch’s director. ‘If there’s no right to be informed what a database says about you, the first you’re going to know is when you’re wrongly arrested, when you don’t get that job, or when you can’t get on that plane.’
While the High Level Contact Group has been busily diluting future data protection, the Americans have spent the past several months making some sweeping, more immediate demands.
Their chosen vehicle is the Visa Waiver Programme – the system that allows British and most EU citizens to visit America without passport visas. Henceforth, under the 9/11 Commission Act, passed in the US last year, visa waiver countries will be obliged to agree to stringent new security standards – including access to data.
Post a comment on AAWR
0 Responses to " "Post a Comment
We welcome contributions from all sides of the debate, at AAWR comment is free, AAWR may edit and/or delete your comments if abusive, threatening, illegal or libellous according to our understanding of, no emails will be published. Your comments may be published on other nationalist media sites worldwide.