Stay-home mums' returning to work could resent migrants, warns equalities chief

Mothers who stay at home will be among those who resent immigrants the most as the recession bites, Trevor Phillips warned yesterday. 

The equality watchdog chief said that when such women return to the workplace to balance the family books they could find themselves 'rejected for job after job' in favour of migrants. 

He cited it as an example of when disadvantaged white people may require special help. 

Mr Phillips said: 'We need to look out for the wife or partner with a young child, whose husband may have lost his job, or who fears that he will; or who finds that the bills just don't add up unless she goes back to work. 

'When she applies for work and is rejected for job after job in a slack labour market, yet sees a clever young Latvian or Lithuanian with two degrees and three languages doing the job she'd like to do, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to work out how she'll feel.  

'And add to that the picture of her child's nursery class, with, as she will see it, an overworked teacher confronted with a class of 30 that speaks 15 languages at home, who will she resent for not having the life she thinks she deserves?' 

Mr Phillips yesterday told the Confederation of British Industry conference that such groups of disadvantaged whites should benefit from 'positive action' in the coming downturn.

But the chairman of the Equalities and Human Rights Commission stopped short of saying the law should be changed to allow positive discrimination. 

It means any extra help would effectively be limited to assistance with training, or gaining a place in education. 

In a wide-ranging speech, Mr Phillips also predicted migrants would begin to send home more cash in remittances as they sought to help relatives in other countries gripped by the global financial crisis. 

And he said that while it was no longer racist to debate immigration, the terms must be 'realistic and sober', not 'apocalyptic'. 

Mr Phillips also insisted the UK was not 'full', but needed migration to be better spread around. At present, it is concentrated in London and the South East. 

At the same conference, gaffe-prone immigration minister Phil Woolas finally declared Labour has no plans to place an 'upper limit' on migrant numbers. 

After more than a week of confusion in which he suggested the population would be limited to 70million, Mr Woolas told delegates: 'Let me make it very clear, the Government is not proposing to cap migration. 

'Neither is it looking to set an upper limit on migration, but we need to recognise that the labour market might change.'  continues here

So it’s “no longer racist to debate immigration”, do you know why dear readers, why its no longer racist, because the job is done non-whites predominate many of our cities and the migration they now oppose is largely white. So it is okay, okay now to resist immigration, more especially because, many of these new immigrants hold conservative values, values not dissimilar to those held by the Britain of old.

So we are to hate the “Latvian or Lithuanian” for stealing our jobs, taking ours houses and seizing our assets, yet god forbid we oppose non-white immigration, why then they will release hell itself against you. It would seem to me there is an agenda, a cleverly disguised plan, for we simply cannot have more white people flooding in can we, white people that in many cases hold knowledge of the truth.

Many new arrivals have knowledge of the left when it is undisguised, when it reveals its real face, such an evil ideology soaked in the blood of many, of course for now they rule us, these one time Marxists (sic) for now. Let me make it clear, all immigration be it white or otherwise must cease, we are simply full up however, managed immigration perhaps in the future, is a possibility and certainly immigration of those of similar stock, is imminently preferable to that of peoples inassimilable. 14

Related Posts by Categories