Apparently, I'm not British

22:40 by Editor · 1 Post a comment on AAWR

According to the Daily Mail, even second- and third-generation children born in the UK are not truly 'British'

In another lifetime, a few years ago, when I used to run messageboards primarily populated by British Asians, we were occasionally invaded by National Front and BNP trolls. They told us to "go back to your own country", and we retorted that we were born here and had as much right to call ourselves British as they did. Their retort almost inevitably was: "Just because a dog is born in a stable doesn't make it a horse".

But who really takes lessons in citizenship from BNP activists? I've always maintained that we decide whether to call ourselves British, English or whatever other identity, not the racists. I have a Sikh mate with a large beard who sports his English football shirt with its big St George's flag with pride. Who am I to argue with him?

But, apparently, journalists at the Daily Mail are not happy with that state of affairs.

In a typical anti-immigration article in the Daily Mail yesterday,
journalists Steve Doughty and James Slacker wrote:

However although the figures from the Government's Office for National Statistics show an increase in numbers of foreign-born people they still fail to record the true impact of immigration because they record their children as British rather than second- or third-generation immigrants.
The implication is clear: you may be the second, third or fourth generation born in the UK, but you're still not truly British. Daily Mail journalists, in other words, are happily pushing BNP views and their editor Paul Dacre is happy to let it pass.

James Slacker has a long history of abusing statistics to produce inflammatory hysteria around immigration. So this should come as no surprise.

But this is the first time I've seen a national newspaper endorse the view that "the true impact of immigration" is being hidden because people such as myself, or anyone with Irish, American, African or Asian ancestry, shouldn't classify themselves as British.

As Sunder Katwala of the Fabians says in an open letter to Paul Dacre:

I hope that your proposed reclassification of Prince
Charles, Prince William and Prince Harry as not British, as second and third generation immigrants descended from the foreign-born Philip, will not distress them too much.
 continues here

Related Posts by Categories



Post a comment on AAWR

1 Responses to "Apparently, I'm not British"
2008 Taxes said...
1 April 2009 at 04:53

That is pretty extreme that being born in England isn't enough to be considered British. Do you get to skip paying taxes?


Post a Comment

We welcome contributions from all sides of the debate, at AAWR comment is free, AAWR may edit and/or delete your comments if abusive, threatening, illegal or libellous according to our understanding of, no emails will be published. Your comments may be published on other nationalist media sites worldwide.