LONDON: In a major legal victory, nearly 10,000 Indian and other non-European Union professionals will be able to claim compensation forhardship caused by the 2006 changes to immigration rules that were struck down by the High Court here.
The court last evening ruled that the changes to the rules, extending the number of years required for indefinite stay in the UK from four to five years under which they originally entered Britain, were unfair.
The court last evening ruled that the changes to the rules, extending the number of years required for indefinite stay in the UK from four to five years under which they originally entered Britain, were unfair.
"The ruling paves the way for the Indian and other non-EU professionals who entered the UK under the programme to claim compensation for the inconvenience and extra costs endured by having to wait an extra year before settlement"
It is the second time in a year that the retrospective changes to the programme for the "brightest and best" migrants, including Indians doctors and other professionals, have been declared unfair and unlawful by the court.
In a strongly-worded ruling, Justice Cox declared that the five-year rule imposed by the Home Office on people already in the country was unlawful.
"It would be unlawful for the (Home Secretary) to withhold indefinite leave to remain from all those members of the highly skilled migrant programme who were already on the scheme before April 3, 2006, by reference to a qualifying period of five years' continuous residence," she said.
In a strongly-worded ruling, Justice Cox declared that the five-year rule imposed by the Home Office on people already in the country was unlawful.
"It would be unlawful for the (Home Secretary) to withhold indefinite leave to remain from all those members of the highly skilled migrant programme who were already on the scheme before April 3, 2006, by reference to a qualifying period of five years' continuous residence," she said.
The judgment directs British government to honour its original commitments made to participants of Highly Skilled Migrant Programme (HSMP), which is no longer in operation. The ruling paves the way for the Indian and other non-EU professionals who entered the UK under the programme to claim compensation for the inconvenience and extra costs endured by having to wait an extra year before settlement.
The migrants suffered financial difficulties because of the inability to secure a competitive mortgage without indefinite leave to remain.
There was also a continuing lack of good employment or promotional opportunities, including an inability to travel potentially resulting in career setbacks, and the migrant's children's education would also have been more expensive.
In October 2008, HSMP Forum, a campaigning body, representing about 50,000 highly skilled migrants, mostly Indians, filed a Judicial Review application challenging the Home Office on changes to the terms of settlement.
Amit Kapadia of the Forum said instead of addressing the issue of illegal and burdensome immigration, government has been penalising the legal and desirable section of Highly Skilled Migrants, who are making a valuable contribution to UK economy by offering requisite skills, paying all the taxes and at the same time not availing public funds.
Accepting the ruling, a Home Office spokesman said: "This case was about an old set of rules that have been swept away by our new points-based system. We believed we had fully implemented the previous judge's findings relating to the changes we made to the HSMP in 2006. continues here
The migrants suffered financial difficulties because of the inability to secure a competitive mortgage without indefinite leave to remain.
There was also a continuing lack of good employment or promotional opportunities, including an inability to travel potentially resulting in career setbacks, and the migrant's children's education would also have been more expensive.
In October 2008, HSMP Forum, a campaigning body, representing about 50,000 highly skilled migrants, mostly Indians, filed a Judicial Review application challenging the Home Office on changes to the terms of settlement.
Amit Kapadia of the Forum said instead of addressing the issue of illegal and burdensome immigration, government has been penalising the legal and desirable section of Highly Skilled Migrants, who are making a valuable contribution to UK economy by offering requisite skills, paying all the taxes and at the same time not availing public funds.
Accepting the ruling, a Home Office spokesman said: "This case was about an old set of rules that have been swept away by our new points-based system. We believed we had fully implemented the previous judge's findings relating to the changes we made to the HSMP in 2006. continues here
![Churchill, Hitler and the Unnecessary War](http://patbuchananbooks.com/wp-content/uploads/bk-pjb-chuw165.jpg "Churchill_Hitler_the_Unnecessary_War\")
Post a comment on AAWR
0 Responses to "HSMP case: UK compensation for Indian migrant professionals"Post a Comment
We welcome contributions from all sides of the debate, at AAWR comment is free, AAWR may edit and/or delete your comments if abusive, threatening, illegal or libellous according to our understanding of, no emails will be published. Your comments may be published on other nationalist media sites worldwide.