• Israeli minister concerned over sensitivities to pork
• Mexican ambassador complains about alternative
With governments around the world struggling to find the appropriate response to the new flu danger, it might be assumed that they had more important things on their mind than what to call the virus. Not so.
Trouble began yesterday when a health minister in Israel raised an objection to "swine flu" on the grounds of Jewish and Muslim sensitivities over pork. Yakov Litzman, a member of an ultra-Orthodox Jewish community, came up with his own alternative: "Mexican flu."
That had the advantage of sparing Jews and Muslims discomfort. It had the disadvantage, however, of causing Mexicans even greater discomfort.
Mexico's ambassador to Israel, Frederico Salas, was duly dispatched to register an official complaint over the suggestion. The move prompted a hurried retraction from the Israeli government, which insisted it had no intention of changing the name.
If the virus is not, after all, to mutate into "Mexican flu", what then is it to be called? Swine flu looks likely to hold for the time being, though as it changes and spreads its connection to pigs will become increasingly tenuous. continues here
• Mexican ambassador complains about alternative
With governments around the world struggling to find the appropriate response to the new flu danger, it might be assumed that they had more important things on their mind than what to call the virus. Not so.
Trouble began yesterday when a health minister in Israel raised an objection to "swine flu" on the grounds of Jewish and Muslim sensitivities over pork. Yakov Litzman, a member of an ultra-Orthodox Jewish community, came up with his own alternative: "Mexican flu."
That had the advantage of sparing Jews and Muslims discomfort. It had the disadvantage, however, of causing Mexicans even greater discomfort.
Mexico's ambassador to Israel, Frederico Salas, was duly dispatched to register an official complaint over the suggestion. The move prompted a hurried retraction from the Israeli government, which insisted it had no intention of changing the name.
If the virus is not, after all, to mutate into "Mexican flu", what then is it to be called? Swine flu looks likely to hold for the time being, though as it changes and spreads its connection to pigs will become increasingly tenuous. continues here
![Churchill, Hitler and the Unnecessary War](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_sY7NiaNZFaMx9Oa3CWdkP7n_Lw6vN96AA1eOLDz_j3x6HQkJ148PJYeBYjaXIrDgP8_EMhr0jsdgRy_JujPSsTkCU9XHZEgRED4cHWUN9bwndoFuk-ix4jcLUBTC4bjRgcnQk=s0-d "Churchill_Hitler_the_Unnecessary_War\")
Post a comment on AAWR
0 Responses to "What's in a name? Governments debate 'swine flu' versus 'Mexican' flu"Post a Comment
We welcome contributions from all sides of the debate, at AAWR comment is free, AAWR may edit and/or delete your comments if abusive, threatening, illegal or libellous according to our understanding of, no emails will be published. Your comments may be published on other nationalist media sites worldwide.