Awaiting A Western Renaissance: Dystopia

Showing posts with label Dystopia. Show all posts

BAN ON OUTDOOR SMOKING

11:51 by Editor · 0 Post a comment on AAWR

SMOKING outside pubs and offices could be banned under plans to be announced by the European Union tomorrow.

Brussels bureaucrats want to outlaw it in areas like beer gardens and covered patios – and even extend it to concerts such as last weekend’s Glastonbury Festival.

The European Commission says the current ban in enclosed public places doesn’t go far enough and non-smokers are still in danger. continues here

a vaporous freedom

17:56 by Editor · 0 Post a comment on AAWR

We live in really quite reprehensible times, at least here, here at home in the UK, however friends abroad, tell me that this spreading tyranny grows, that moves to create a global hell continue apace. In this country what passes for government, seeks to eavesdrop upon the people, seeks to place us all upon a database, controlled, scrutinised and shackled. You may have taken the time to read many AAWR posts here, that refer to big-brother, if not you should do so now, you should realise the extent they rob us of freedom, the extent of the growing menace.

We posted here an article concerning this reprehensible regimes plans to record every email and website visit made, alongside that of telephones, yet as reported only quite recently, even car users are not immune, this regime means to obtain complete and unshakable control and I cannot feign surprise.

Leftism is by its very nature artificial and therefore needs draconian law and repression in order to function, it warps reality feigning victim status whilst in reality it is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. Undercover of humanitarianism it will instigate oppression and once the time is right, it will unleash the people’s misery. Of course there have been countless “practices”, countless times when leftism thought it had it right, that is until the people triumphed. Yet for how long can the people triumph, for how long can we hold fast to freedom and inhibit the left, we live in an age of technology, an age whereby machines can and indeed do, replace humans in the workplace.

It is now possible to control a people en-masse with little dependency upon man-power, in the future even the need for the army will become redundant, as weapons become evermore automated and are focused upon the frailties of the human condition. Already weapons are in production that can serve no other purpose than to control the masses, weapons instead of focusing solely upon a singular human being are now developed to control and attack population densities. Instead of targeting group offenders weapons will target the group, the same of course can be said for this mass eavesdropping, they no longer even care if we know, so very certain are they of victory, they know full well that the dysfunctional society they have purposely created allows for no unity, no common purpose, save for what they themselves create.

In fact, as in days of old they ferment disunity, create chaos in order to function, have we no backbone, no courage, did it die long ago, are we so weak, they mean us harm, they ride out for evil and we barely stir. Again I beg you, do not fall for this it is all Islam rubbish, do not let them lead you, it is a trick, a ruse and we sleepwalk to our end, they need a boogieman, need an evil group, need it to implant their security measures. Have you never wondered why it is, in this the age of political correctness, why Muslims can be so maligned, why the owned media can disparage seemingly at will.

What if forces similar to those igniting anti-Islamic sentiment here, operated in the east, spewing anti-western sentiment, what a hotchpotch, what a brew, what a cauldron of cleverness, what if the intent was purposeful, had common purpose and the result a global hell. Here at home they destroy all, is it not the case in the east also, here at home freedom crumbles and tyranny marches in, everything we say, everything we do, everything we are is under scrutiny, is it not fast becoming time that we shake them off, that we take back our countries and our freedoms whatever it takes.

There is a better solution than robbing us of freedoms, a better solution than implementing such evil, leave them alone. Let them live according to their beliefs, unmolested within their own lands, stop supporting the rogue state and let freedom reign. We won’t, we’ll still disparage them, still send troops to sovereign nations, men, women and children will still die and they will ratchet up the hate, the silly among nationalists will contest the wrong for and the people of this country will still permit the loss of their freedoms and nothing will change form the plan.

Good god must it be this way, must we permit this, this evil, must we let evil flourish as good men stand by, what then are we worth, what if we stand idle, have we not seen what the left can do, what elites evoke, what evil endeavours. Are you so content with football and food, gadgets and gossip that you forget what hews nations, what it takes to create them, what it takes also to preserve them.

What a clever game they play, so intricate and fine, not even a fleeting glimpse of true reality amongst such smoke and mirrors, is this then your freedom, your desired state, watched, observed and recorded, is this the land you deserve because I condemn it, every facet. Does it not bother you, are you not moved, do you not fear for those to come and does your heart not clench with dread, do you not mourn what was and what should be and what if we fight now could be or will you sit on your hands and let them take you.

In many ways the last hope of a people are the military, the last line of defence in all circumstance, yet do we have that now or have we lost even that, surely the police work now for other interests, lost to those they once served, now the people who made Britain great, the nation stock, is dying can no-one hear us scream. Must we die unlamented, unfairly for no crime or will any listen, will they close their ears to untruths and rush to our aid, we scream tormented and not a hand reaches out, not a one, for all we gave and all we sired.

We gave the world the concept of freedom and now it is here, in that home, that it vanishes from the world, we an experiment in tyranny, in control and social engineering. We were a fine kind, a fine band, respected once I feel but no more, they ripped apart our empire, until finally coming for the people, America is next, then we are gone, the rise and fall of two empires in a heartbeat. I hope we fight back, I hope I live to be there, to wrest control from evil and give it back to the people, yet who really knows, the young still carefree unknowing, concerned with intimate matters, image and the pursuit of happiness.

Who to tell them, to who will they listen, who to galvanise and crush this tyranny, oh but you need crushing, demolishing, ending, it is either you or we ,better you be gone for the world than we. You need not spy upon me I will tell you, I will be open I shall not hide, you ruin all, destroy everything and think me dim, as if I were nothing, a thing, a white European male in the beginning of the twenty first century, such a despised being, a loathed entity but I am here and I know you. I know what you wish to implement, what already you have done and I know you must be dealt with, I know also that, it is only the people that can do it but they must do it quick, whilst there is time.

We must resist, resist in every way, we cannot let them continue, cannot let them realize their evil, we must of course contest immigration, be it Islamic or any other but lets not rush to evils banner, lets not give them their culture clash, their sought for war of disparate peoples, have we not lost enough on their chosen battles, drenched fields with blood for cause unknown. Dam them, if we must fight we must choose time and place and indeed enemy, we must I am afraid realise that it has gone too far we must gear up to wrestle back our lands, our freedoms and save ourselves in doing so.

I post below the Data Retention Directive, known as Directive 2006/24/EC, these being the newly written laws to spy upon a nation’s people, please remember that these laws apply to many countries, all within mainland Europe, relevant to the UK follows:

So there you have it, freedom in ruins although it has been for a while hasn’t it, perhaps our bravest died upon the field so long ago and we are unworthy for their shoes. I like to think not, I like to think that we still have it within us to resist tyranny to shake loose its grip and again live in peace upon this planet. I believe that all Europeans and those of full descent, must band together now, must circle the wagons and prepare for a white Alamo.

They've got your number

00:03 by Editor · 0 Post a comment on AAWR

Every call made, email sent and website visited is now being logged under new regulations. What does that mean for investigative journalists - and their need to protect sources? Charles Arthur reports

Want to be an investigative journalist of the future? You'll need a pen and paper, pay-as-you-go phone, and a motorbike. We'll explain the motorbike later. But you may be an endangered species. New regulations that came into force last week - requiring telephone and internet companies to keep logs of what numbers are called, and which websites and email services and internet telephony contacts are made - have left some wondering if investigative journalism, with its need to protect sources (and its sources' need, often, for protection), has been dealt a killer blow.

Worries focus on the fact that every government department, local council and even quango can access this telephone and internet data, given a judge's clearance. What will they use it for? To investigate everything from treason to flytipping. Might it also be used to find out who has been tipping off a journalist on a local paper about the misdeeds of local councillors? That's the concern.

"I would say that investigative reporting is desperately threatened by what this government is doing. I've been thinking a long time about how to stay one step ahead of the game," says the Brighton-based investigative journalist Duncan Campbell (not the reporter of the same name on this paper). "The good news is that the surveillance methods that would close down what we do are still one step away. This isn't the one that does the real harm."

That will come, Campbell thinks, when the police put all sorts of information - vehicle licence plates' movements, emails, phone calls - into a real-time system that anyone can access. But that's not to say the new regulations will not have an impact.

In 1986, Campbell uncovered and revealed the UK's secret Zircon spy satellite, and in 1988 the Echelon worldwide eavesdropping system; more recently he has written for this paper about police errors in Operation Ore prosecutions, meant to target viewers of child pornography but which accused people who had had their credit card details stolen.

A story that spread about Zircon was that Campbell spotted its existence because of the difference between two press releases - one from a satellite manufacturer and one from the Ministry of Defence. In fact he also had inside help. "I had confidential sources," he says. "There was always 5% in the stories that came from a whistleblower."

Sources are essential to Campbell's work. Investigative journalists may write many dull stories and meet lots of dull people, but some of those they meet or influence through those stories matter enormously. Bob Woodward - who, with Carl Bernstein, uncovered the Watergate scandal while at the Washington Post - met Mark Felt, who became his contact, Deep Throat, by chance at the White House in 1970. Woodward was in the navy, working as a courier; Felt was in the FBI. Both were waiting outside the Situation Room one day. They chatted and kept in touch: two years later Woodward had a top-level source. His identity remained secret until Felt admitted it in 2005; he died last December.

But what of such sources now? The concern is that if someone gets in touch with a journalist, who then writes a story based on that information, the new regulations mean that the police - or intelligence services or local council - can work back from the database of all the contacts made to the journalist and figure out who the whistleblower is. It blows a huge hole in the journalist's legal defence under section 10 of the Contempt of Court Act of 1981 that sources can stay secret unless "the court is satisfied disclosure is necessary in the interests of justice or national security or for the prevention of disorder or crime". Join the communications dots, and a suspect is fingered.

How do you counter that risk? "Step down a couple of technological rungs," says David Leigh, the Guardian's investigations editor. "Just send a letter - you know, snail mail." He adds: "When I've dealt with secret sources they take very great care not to communicate on any electronic medium."

The next step, says Campbell, is to do what drug dealers and terrorists do: use pay-as-you-go phones and unregistered sim cards, bought with cash. Such closed rings are almost unbreakable - once you've met to swap numbers.

But must journalists and sources really use the same tactics as terrorists and drug dealers? If that's the price of free, civil society, then yes, Campbell says. "The abuse of free communications by a minority is part of the price of liberty. [But] this government appears to think that it is civil society [itself] and so needs no checks or balances on its intrusions into private lives."

Then again, don't many scandals involve private companies, which won't have access to the communications data? Neil Hamilton, Jonathan Aitken, British Aerospace (BAE) - none of those would be affected by this change, surely?

Leigh isn't so sure. He and Campbell both say that any database will eventually spill out to those who pay enough or know the right people. Where big companies are involved, big money is at stake. "I have sources in the US who refuse to communicate via electronic means because they say it's insecure," Leigh says. "I know there are sources who already felt this before the new regulations. The bottom line about this is that anybody who imagines that electronic communications are secure is crazy."

There can't be investigative journalism without people willing to talk. And more and more important stories are emerging not from journalistic prying, but from those involved: the pictures from Abu Ghraib, taken by the US guards themselves; the details of Home Office failings, leaked from within it to the Tory MP Damian Green; the video provided to the Guardian last week showing a police officer assaulting Ian Tomlinson, who died during the G20 protests in London.

Technology is, however, also making life easier for investigative journalists. "I have more information at my fingertips than ever before," says Leigh. The government and its agencies may be able to track journalists, but equally journalists can spread information over the web, from where it can't be removed. The Freedom of Information Act also provides some leverage against government, if not a counterbalance to the new surveillance methods.

Leigh calls it a game of "attack and defence" - the internet works both ways, but slightly more in the journalist's favour. He has just returned from Berkeley, California, and the presentation of a new film based on this newspaper's investigation into BAE's slush funds. How was the mood of journalists over there? "They were all miserable, but it wasn't about this. It was because they were being thrown out of their jobs because the newspapers are going bust." Oh, yes - a method even the government couldn't dream up. Campbell observes wryly: "I don't think, despite the claims of the blogocracy, that they [bloggers] have stepped into legally hard investigative journalism."

He thinks that if unchecked, the government's monitoring proposals "within a decade will threaten to bring [investigative journalism] to an end. It's not that whistleblowers will be rounded up, but that the chilling effect of the surveillance society means no whistleblower will feel a journalist can protect them."

What really troubles him is the automatic numberplate recognition (ANPR) system implemented by the police across the country to track vehicle tax evaders and criminals, but also potentially to record where you've been. Currently it can only be accessed by the police and intelligence services, and you can't yet do it in real time - when that moment comes, it will be truly dangerous, says Campbell.

The system does pose a threat to sources' anonymity, agrees Leigh: if you assume that CCTV is watching any public journey, the only way left to meet is through a private journey in your car. "ANPR is a greater threat [than internet and phone-logging] because it's tracking the physical movement of vehicles that are closely correlated to people," Campbell says. "Unlike sim cards." continues here

Children as young as three should be reported for 'racism', Government-funded group claims

10:14 by Editor · 0 Post a comment on AAWR

Toddlers should be taught about racism and singled out for criticism if they have racist attitudes, a Government-funded advisory group said yesterday.

It told nursery teachers, playgroup leaders and childminders to record and report every racist incident involving children as young as three.

These could include saying 'Yuk' about unfamiliar food.

Even babies should not be ignored in the hunt for racism because they can 'recognise different people in their lives', a new guide for nurseries and child care centres said.

The instructions for staff in charge of pre-school children in day care have been produced by the National Children's Bureau, which receives £12million a year, mostly through taxpayer-funded organisations.

The NCB, which describes itself as 'an umbrella body for the children's sector', has long used its resources to campaign on controversial issues, for example in favour of a legal ban on smacking by parents.

It also runs the Sex Education Forum, a campaign for more sex education in schools.

The new 366-page guide, Young Children and Racial Justice, warned that 'racist incidents among children in early years settings-tend to be around name-calling-casual thoughtless comments, and peer group relationships'.

It said such incidents could include children using words like 'blackie', 'Pakis', 'those people' or 'they smell'.

Children might also 'react negatively to a culinary tradition other than their own by saying "yuk".'

Nursery staff are told: 'No racist incident should be ignored. When there is a clear racist intent, it is necessary to be specific in condemning the action.'

If children 'reveal negative attitudes the lack of censure may indicate to the child that there is nothing unacceptable about such attitudes'.

Nurseries are encouraged to report as many racist incidents as possible to local councils.

'Some people think that if a large number of racist incidents are reported, this will reflect badly on the institution,' it said. 'In fact, the opposite is the case.'

The guidance said that anyone who disagrees is racist themselves. continues here

Are you awake yet, do you even care, it doesn’t seem you do, you continue on with your life whilst they destroy us, we are marked for extinction and unless we challenge it now they will win. Our children, or if we last that long, our grandchildren face an appalling future, a future where they are the minority, they the alien in their natural homelands, do you think for one second, that non-whites will exhibit the same degree of empathy, if not sheer capitulation, we have shown, do you think whites will be granted any concessions, the simple answer is no. We can see already the intolerance for the west these new-comers show, all it takes is for you to stand up and say enough, to show the leftists and their reprehensible backers that, they have had their day. To strive for something more than self, to try to heal this country, how in all conscious can you stand idly by, whilst they indoctrinate your own children, whilst they corrupt the innocent.

What ideology is it that requires such draconian enforcement, quite simply a wrong one, if multiculturalism was the benefit they tell you it is, why then the need for thought police, the need for laws, the need for anti-white-discrimination, why the need to besiege the minds of our most precious possession, our children, truly this is an evil ideology. Yet I stand amazed, amazed and appalled because you the people let them do it, you let them ride roughshod over your right to exist and your freedoms, you let them destroy western civilisation without a whimper, without even a cursory glance. You hold within you the power to change this, the power to alter and resist their evil plans, without you all of you who read this we cannot win, we simply cannot put right all the wrongs without a mandate from the people. We can talk a good fight, we can debate the issues but we cannot, simply cannot heal this nation and others, without a united effort, without you.

It should be the ultimate taboo the one thing that forces us to draw a line in the sand and shout no, no more, we simply refuse you, we will no longer bow down to your rubbish, to your garbage, to your filthy lies, leave our children alone. You have broken the family, lowered standards, attacked the unborn, pilloried white males, forced women into the workplace, taxed us for others, lied to us, made our society less caring and more violent, ruined everything but leave our children alone. The left should be running in fear, surrounded by the chaos of rage, harried back to whichever hellhole they came from, they should never again be permitted to preach their vile gospel, their evil philosophy and we, we survivors should begin anew to repair the damage they have caused. We should bring light back in, where once darkness flourished we should above all protect children, the rights of the child should be paramount to all after all they are our future.

Instead you won’t change, you won’t lift as much as a finger, you will remain so caught up with self that, you will sacrifice their future, hand them over on a plate, give their tomorrows, so you can have today. We are no longer what we were, we have been changed, altered, we have become monsters, caring for nothing but ourselves, we have thrown away our greatest strength, our unique altruism, a selflessness that enabled us to build the worlds only lasting society, the worlds foremost civilisation, but no longer. It is over, finished, we have succumb to savagery, we are a mere shadow of what we once were, evolution set in reverse, as the savage we admire shiny objects bedecked in gold, caring more for a label than for a child. We import dissimilar people to make up the numbers, as we kill our own in the womb; we banish our old, out of sight and presumably out of mind, to institutions to whither and simply die. We place minority over majority, lauding stupidity whilst deriding intellect, we admire violence, dishonesty and disrespect and teach our children these traits, and we are so unhappy that, many stagger bleary-eyed through life, high on drugs or alcohol or both. The law of the jungle has returned and all are prey, the flash of a knife and life is over, we creep around fearfully or find safety in a group, the power of the parent lies shattered and broken, a once valued antique. They have destroyed us, altered our very society, look around you for the better, do you prefer this, this incremental extinction, this erosion of good, this perversion, this malevolence.

Is it some sort of mind-numbing madness, some illusionists trick, do you not see, not hear, does anger not fuel your engine and sorrow not set your sail, do you not fence with reason and find yourself wanting. Do you contort as a gymnast avoiding all taboos, striving to comply with all they want, never realising that the exercise is over, the competition run and it is they that were wrong, they that have failed however, they won’t admit it, despotism is forever stubborn. Despotism, tyranny, can never be gently lathered away, never be sedately swept, it must be scrubbed until the flesh of society is red, until every vestige of filth is washed away. Yet although they have failed their lies still hold you true, the glue of madness binds your freedom and the bars of repression steal the future, it is coming, hold on tight, you may live to see the evil you permitted entrance, the demon you refused to contain. You may live to see the fear in your children’s eyes mixed with anger at your inaction; you may live to regret not fighting when chance came calling, when the merest glimmer of hope shone brightly.

If you can stand aside as they take your children, if you can watch unperturbed, perhaps you deserve your fate, perhaps I am wrong and there is nothing left to fight for. Perhaps the struggle is over and evil has the field, perhaps I should succumb as you have, caught in their web of lies, perhaps I should never again look to my fellows or strive for our children’s tomorrow. Perhaps the cow truly jumps over the moon, the yellow brick road truly leads to Oz and there is gold at the end of the rainbow, perhaps we are all equal and leftist philosophy is benign, perhaps tyranny doesn’t augment and money grows on trees, perhaps I can turn about and leave all I love to die, perhaps I am you. 14

Awaiting A Western Renaissance

BAN ON OUTDOOR SMOKING

a vaporous freedom

They've got your number

Children as young as three should be reported for 'racism', Government-funded group claims

In your opinion are the EDL.

Quote of the week

Can formerly white nations regain their racial autonomy, that is to say become racial homogenous again?

Blogger Tricks

Recent Posts

Archives

Labels

Recently on Awaiting A Western Renaissance

Blogger Themes

American Renaissance News

Nation of Cowards

Taki’s Magazine

Patrick J. Buchanan

Migration Watch UK: News

Antisemitica

AAWR Recent comments

Sarah Maid of Albion

Occidental Dissent