The End of the Road for SA Sucks

Dear readers, bloggers and fellow Whites

This will be the last of many thousands of posts & articles we at WSAS sweated so much blood & tears to bring you over the years. I am shutting down this ground-breaking blog on Friday 13 November.

As you’re aware, the situation has become utterly untenable. I am no longer willing to put the welfare and safety of my family, and the families of other SA-resident bloggers at risk. It is heart-breaking, and a tough decision I struggled with (but was in denial about) since my arrest and detention last week. Your incredible support really moved me. So did the support of so many other bloggers, friends and comrades, locally as well as overseas.

I know some will call me a coward, a quitter, a yellow-bellied traitor even. So be it. I can no longer look my precious daughters, or my long-suffering wife in the eye, see their fear and sheer terror every time there is a knock on the door and continue to ignore it. I am torn between on the one hand my duty as a father & husband to ensure the safety and security of my gorgeous family, and on the other my duty & loyalty to my magnificent, beautiful White race.

It really hurts like hell that the worst betrayals came from within our own ranks. Not that I am a stranger to it either - over the past four years of this blog’’s existence, we’ve had to fend off far more vicious attacks from those on the right claiming to be our racial brethren, than any number of sellouts, liberals or misguided & brainwashed race traitors spouting their pre-programmed propaganda memes on this forum.

The SA Sucks blog was symptomatic of a wider phenomenon: that of Whites throwing off the oppressive chains of political correctness and needless guilt. As the race which spearheaded civilization, technology, art, music and ‘high culture’ we have so much to be proud of. South Africa was a glittering beacon in a sea of African darkness, now it is rapidly fading away. Internationally the pendulum is swinging to the right as our people’s infatuation with multi-culturalism turns into apprehension, disgust and finally, rejection. Lets hope our racial awakening is not too late. Sadly in SA, it is.

The rise of the internet rates on par in our history with the invention of Gutenberg’s printing press. It broke the media choke-hold on our minds, and became a tool with which we can set ourselves free from the endless demands of the parasite races leeching off our decency and artificially, needlessly instilled guilt.

The closure of SA Sucks is not the end of the world - excellent websites and blogs already exist where you can continue to read uncensored, hard-hitting news, commentary and insights. I implore you, dear reader to support especially those we have linked to. I also implore you to take the baton from us, go forth and create your own blogs and websites. Please carry on the momentum, and learn from the foolish mistakes I made. Trust nobody, guard your online identity with your life, and above all, stay true to your heritage.

As the Negros in America have their proverbial “Uncle Toms”, so we dwinding Whites in SA have our “Uncle Freds”. Watch out for them, guard against them and remember the prophetic words of Cicero:

“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself.

For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murder is less to fear.” Cicero Marcus Tullius
106-43 BC

As of last week, I entered a rather forboding, dark and grim phase of my life and what the future holds is suddenly quite uncertain. Pandora’s box opened rather abruptly last Wednesday. The endless death threats to my family are no longer limited to my email and comments pages, but are now trickling through our home & cell phones. Although I always considered it an extremely remote, paranoid possibility that my door would be kicked down as it was, I never really expected it to come to that.

If you’re still in SA, please heed the message of this blog since its inception - get out, get out get out, while you still can! You’re not “running away”. You are carrying out the only rational, logical option open to you. This ship is sinking fast, either you jump or go down with it. Secondly, depriving the murderous parasites of your brains, your skills, your taxes, your participation in what formerly was a fantastic country to live in, will not only set you free - it is also the ultimate sanction - depriving the parasites of a host. Let them have their land, and their renamed towns, their crumbling roads, cities, collapsing power utilities, schools, hospitals, their corruption and their savagery. Shrug Atlas, shrug!

Folks, I sincerely thank all of you for reading and participating in this blog. Without our core of readers, we would have been nothing. To my fellow bloggers - Doodler, Dark Raven, Uncle Cracker, Gonville, Bantu Ed, Foxie, Cynic, Grumbleguts, HODD, Eli the Bearded, Knorrig, Real Realist, Truthsayer USA, Adriana, Diamed - thank you for your fantastic work and your tireless efforts to get the truth out about South Africa.

To those whom I insulted, argued with and belittled over the years, I apologise. Some of you deserved it, some not. Bygones now. I wish you all well, and hope some day we’ll all be back here. Always remember, we’re not the last of a dying breed, but the first of a brave new world.

Goodbye my dear friends, go thee well.

Uhuru Guru

11 November 2009

———————————————————————–

This blog was dedicated to the Sons and Daughters of Europe Wherever They Reside.

“In the end all will be forgiven except treachery to the race”


continues here

Editorial :

This is not the first time and sadly it will not be the last, also it must be remembered that a site that speaks truth as many of the right do creates abject depression in the author, an individual that delves deeper into the mess now being made than most upon the street. Called bloggers by some but authors all they each, in their own way attack this terrible experiment, this monstrous agenda, hopefully leading many others to the terrible truth so that they to will rush to forewarn and therefore forearm their fellow whites. We are dying you see, slowly inexorably fading from existence, with each generation, today our birth-rates in each of our respective countries cannot match that of others, couple this with miscegenation and our future looks truly bleak, yet it is, I believe, the actions of our leaders that ushers in our end, it is they that embrace evil and submit a whole racial genotype to the axe.

Yet nationalism in a territorial sense is no longer enough and it has to be considered boundaries have blurred too much, it is perhaps for this reason that I consider myself a white nationalist ,rather than simple a territorial nationalist, or indeed a civic nationalist. Yet there is much wrong with white nationalism, I am afraid it does not by any stretch of the imagination tick all my boxes, does not satisfy completely on my own particular life journey. Yet what else is there, for if one takes South Africa it is not the white mans country, we have no more right to be there than they here, yet I cannot stand by and remain voiceless as genocide is committed, as those of my kind are so very brutally murdered as the media stand mute.

Whites are hated you see, truly hated, take the mask away from many non-whites and animosity is revealed, fangs bared and posture poised, there are many reasons for it and indeed in many cases they to have been brainwashed but by a different kind of propaganda. However whilst assailed, whilst under attack, does it really matter the motivation of the attackers, it matters only that you must survive against their assault, today around the globe attacks against whites are increasing, rapes are now a norm and any endeavour to oppose such actions are met with the accusation of hater, of bigot, of supremist. Yet for many on the right such monikers have no affect, yet they are not levelled at the right to attack but to repel ,to repel would-be supporters ,after all who would readily face such a barrage, stand up and say, “ENOUGH!”, NO MORE!!”, not many, too few.

All of us that run a nationalist site or weblog face immense risk, in the case of “Uhuru-guru”, the risk was physical, the risk to family extreme, yet even here nationalists face similar attack. Certainly Uhuru-guru had an overt tyrannical state, a state that came to power on the back of anti-white hatred and prevailed over a true and ongoing genocide, some years ago now, I looked at images I wish I hadn’t; I read stories of such horror, as to affect the mind, such barbarity, such wanton violence, such anti-white hatred. Yet the site I was connected with prior to AAWR had a link whereas AAWR never did, at AAWR’s inception I had chosen not to, the reasoning was really quite simple, I did not wish for others to view the images I had seen ,to see schoolboys hanged, victims murdered in the bath or burned beyond recognition, certainly viewing murdered children and the aged, raped and tortured prior to death stays with one.

Whites built that country, they made of it a jewel and none can dispute that fact but it is not a white mans country, not a white mans continent it is time to come home, time to return to Europe, to friends. The shame of it is that they will not in all probability be permitted entry, left to die their at the hands of non-whites, Uhuru-guru on the other hand betrayed by one of his own now looks to the primary group, the personally most important, his family, we can only wish him well, only hope that he and his family manage to flee, remain safe and come home to, it is time indeed to circle the wagons. I have ideas concerning the genocide in SA perhaps they may come to fruition, perhaps I simply will not have the time, may I suggest Sarah Maid of Albion who is keeping a record of those slain, good luck Uhuru-guru, SA Sucks can be viewed here. Hat tip Sarah Maid of Albion

Mohammed is now the third most popular boy's name in England. So why this shabby effort to conceal it?

This week, the Office of National Statistics published a list of the most popular boys' names in Britain: Jack, Oliver, Thomas, Harry, Joshua, Alfie, Charlie, Daniel.

They reflect a cultural tradition as old as the nation's history, and would provoke approving nods from Jack the Ripper, Oliver Cromwell, Thomas Becket and Harry Hotspur.

There is just one small problem: the list is deceitful. In reality, the third most popular choice for boy children born last year in England and Wales was not Thomas, but Mohammed.

The ONS explains blithely that it had no intent to deceive. Its normal practice is to catalogue different spellings separately, as in Mohammed, Muhammed and so on.

But if you add these variants together, as surely seems logical, then Mohammed is right up there, near the top of the list.

Unfortunately, in recent times we have been given plentiful cause for paranoia about attempts by official bodies to conceal from us information about the changing face of Britain which our rulers know that many people will not like.

Immigration figures are routinely distorted. In a rare moment of honesty, a Labour Home Secretary conceded that he had no idea just how many migrants dwell in this country, because of the huge and unquantified pool of illegals.

Many EU nations decline to collate statistics about the religious affiliations of their populations, to avoid rousing sentiment against Muslims.

The ONS's hit parade of children's names, as released for publication, seemed designed to mask a simple truth which dismays millions of people, and which politicians and bureaucracies go to great lengths to bury: the Muslim population of Britain is growing extraordinarily fast.

In 2007, 28 per cent of children born in England and Wales, rising to 54 per cent in London, had at least one foreign-born parent. In 2008, 14.4 per cent of primary school children claimed some other tongue than English as their first language.

The Muslim population is now close to two million, over 3 per cent, and rising fast because Muslim families have more children than most of the rest of us, many of them named Mohammed or Muhammed.

Muslim population has doubled in 30 years, and will double again on present projections by 2015. By 2060, Britain is expected to be the most populous nation in the EU, with 77 million people - this, though today Germany's population is 20 million larger than ours.

A bleak body of pundits, many of them American neoconservatives rather than spokesmen of the British National Party, believe that Europe, and Britain in particular, is threatened by a Muslim tide which will not merely transform its traditional culture but, frankly, bury it.

In a series of recent books, they argue that Islam is colonising this continent in a fashion that will render it unrecognisable a generation or two hence.

Even if this is overstated, the statistics paint a grim picture for those of us who do not wish to live in a small island crowded with 77 million people, even if most of the newcomers were white Australian Christians.

No government massage of the numbers can blunt the fact that a host of migrants is here, most of whom espouse an entirely different cultural tradition from our own.

If a fraction of what we are told about the threat posed by climate change to the world's poorer societies is true, then vastly more of their inhabitants will seek to move West in the decades ahead.

It seems fantastically na've to suppose that many of these newcomers - or even their children born here - will start reading Jane Austen or tuning in to The Archers. They are likely to change Britain, and indeed Europe, more than we shall change them.

The big thing that makes this wave of immigrants so different from those of the past, who became integrated into our society and our ways, is that it is so vast. After World War II, some thousands of Poles settled here, who could not face returning to a communist tyranny.

Many of them had names like Wladyslaw or Miroslaw. Yet when they married and had children, few gave these Polish names. Most became Jacks and Olivers and Harrys. Today, their grandchildren are indistinguishable from ours.

It is hard to believe the same will be true in Birmingham or Leicester, where Muslims are soon expected to outnumber whites. Today, the adolescent children of immigrants tell pollsters that they feel much less integrated into British society than many of their parents profess.

The problem is intensified by cultural problems which are entirely of our own creation: we, the old British, have grown deeply unsure about what we believe in. This helps to explain our fervent attachment to the memory of World War II.

It is a much more powerful force than Christianity. It was the last event in our collective experience about which we are sure we were on the right side, and did well.

Ed Husain, the former Muslim radical whose 2007 book The Islamist painted vivid images both of the shortcomings of British society and Muslim attitudes towards this, wrote: 'In mosques, after prayers, many of my Muslim friends rightly ask what we are supposed to integrate into. 'Big Brother' lifestyle? Ladette culture? Binge drinking? Gambling?'

A society capable of elevating Jade Goody from victim into iconic martyr; whose juries repeatedly refuse to convict footballers even on overwhelming evidence because they are granted the privileges of secular saints; where four-letter language is happily indulged by the BBC and schools seem unable to produce literate children, is scarcely in a strong position to pontificate about British values.

In any discussion about Muslims, we should acknowledge that the morality prevailing in many of their households is at least the equal of ours, and sometimes superior to it.

Because we know this, because we have lost confidence in our own cultural identity, we flail and blather about how to respond to the unprecedented ethnic and demographic turmoil which our politicians have unleashed upon us.

Muslims in Britain will become eager to integrate only when they perceive our society as possessing equal or superior virtues to their own, as today many do not. Only in the treatment of women can we claim to occupy conspicuously higher ground.

Even those of us who deplore the almost uncontrolled tide of immigration should acknowledge huge problems in our own society - the loss of shared disciplines, values and respect - for which newcomers bear no responsibility.

Britain, two generations hence, threatens to become a mere camp site for 77 million people of many races, for whom this represents a mere place to sleep, eat and make money. To avert this, we must address a series of related challenges.

First the next British government must effectively limit immigration. Thereafter, we should follow the French in outlawing the most conspicuous manifestations of cultural separateness, notably the face veil in schools, in law courts and other publicly administered institutions, and at airport security.

Most important, we must rediscover a belief in ourselves, a sense not so much of British nationality as of British community, which others can see the merits of sharing. Parts of this country - its middle-class islands - are still wonderful places to inhabit. They are still definably old Britain.

Others, above all the inner cities, seem lost to civilisation. Everyone outside them, and especially our politicians, have abandoned them to unemployed families, feral children, unchecked crime and huge immigrant communities which may live in this country, but are tragically not of it. continues here

Kennedy opened U.S. doors to Caribbeans

Were it not for Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, Boston’s Caribbean Carnival would be a lot smaller, if it existed at all.

The first major legislation that Kennedy ushered through Congress rewrote the nation’s immigration law, opening the country to exponentially more people from the Caribbean, who ventured out to the annual carnival last Saturday in the wind and rain, not long after the late senator’s funeral concluded on nearby Mission Hill.

That 1965 law eliminated racially tinged quotas that favored immigrants from Europe and restricted the number who could come from Asia and the countries emerging from The 1965 law took full effect in 1968. In the following decade, “West Indian immigration exceeded that of the previous 70 years,”colonialism in Africa and the Caribbean. From the entire continent of Africa, for instance, the annual limit on immigrants had been 1,400 — less than 1 percent of Europe’s quota.

In the case of Jamaica and Trinidad, which both won independence in 1962, only 100 immigrants from each were allowed every year. That was the minimum for any country.

“Most of us would not be here at all. We owe a great debt of gratitude,” said Clarence Cooper, president of Unity Sports & Cultural Club in Dorchester.

Born in Trinidad, Cooper spent two years on a work visa in St. Croix in the U.S. Virgin Islands before arriving on the mainland with an immigrant visa in 1967.

Two years later, Neil Osborne, president of Jamaican Associates, immigrated with his parents at age 5. The family was able to resettle because his father’s brother was already in the United States. Reuniting close relatives was made a priority in the 1965 law that Kennedy got passed.

“Jamaicans significantly understood how he championed immigration in a fair and equal way, and your skin color shouldn’t matter,” said Osborne, a lawyer who represents victims of job discrimination. “He made sure people from the Caribbean could come.”

Kennedy’s assistance to Caribbean immigrants did not end with that law. Community leaders this week attested to his staff’s swift and effective intervention over the years to reunite families with relatives who had been left behind.

Beulah Providence, executive director of the Caribbean Foundation of Boston, which provides home health services, said she frequently referred immigrants to Kennedy’s office for help obtaining visas for family members.

“They called his office, and they got good help,” said Providence, who came from Dominica in 1960. “They got help with their papers.”

The Rev. Nicolas Homicil, senior pastor of the Voice of the Gospel Tabernacle in Mattapan, said Kennedy staffers helped Haitian immigrants in the same way, and also helped relatives in Haiti obtain short-term visas to attend funerals in the United States.

“The Haitian community and the minority community at large are going to miss Senator Kennedy,” said Homicil, who immigrated in 1971.

Kennedy’s staff could get results fast. Back in the 1970s, an immigrant couple who had been in the country for a couple years were having difficulty getting visas to enable their five children in Trinidad to join them, Cooper recalled.

The husband went downtown to see someone in Kennedy’s office and, by the time he returned home, consular officials were calling to say the visas would be available the next day in Port-au-Spain, Trinidad’s capital.

“You hear so many people here talking about things similar to that,” Cooper said in a telephone interview Monday.

His wife, Jemma Cooper, overheard his comment and got on the line to share her own family’s story. Thirty years ago, she said, her mother immigrated under her maiden name. Then she had a hard time obtaining permission to bring three other children from Trinidad — because she used her married name on those papers — until Kennedy’s staff straightened out the confusion.

That kind of constituent service for so many from the Caribbean has been needed only because of the transformative impact of the 1965 immigration law.

Despite the low quotas for Trinidad, Jamaica and the continent of Africa, even fewer immigrants from those places were actually entering the United States. In 1963, The Associated Press reported that no predominantly black nation was using up its quota.

The 1965 law took full effect in 1968. In the following decade, “West Indian immigration exceeded that of the previous 70 years,” author Philip Kasinitz has noted. “By the early 1980s, approximately 50,000 legal immigrants from the Anglophone Caribbean and another 6,000 to 8,000 from Haiti were entering the United States annually.”

Other factors contributed to the rise. The law’s focus on neutral criteria such as kinship ties and job skills was inspired by civil rights legislation, which made the country appear more welcoming to black immigrants. Independence also shifted the destination of most Caribbean immigrants away from the former colonial powers.

“We have discriminated against some people over others, contrary to our basic principles as a nation,” Kennedy said in opening debate on the immigration bill on Sept. 17, 1965.

The legislation was actually a Kennedy co-production. Before his assassination, President John F. Kennedy proposed a similar bill in July 1963. He specifically asked Congress to lift the quotas on Jamaica and Trinidad, limits he called “accidental discrimination against the newly independent nations of the Western Hemisphere.” continues here

POPULATION WILL SOAR TO 70 MILLION, STUDY WARNS

HOME Office claims that Britain’s population will be limited to below 70 million were demolished by a new study yesterday.

Immigration Minister Phil Woolas had dismissed forecasts that nine million ­more people will be added to the country’s current population of 61 million within 25 years.

But research published by think-tank Migrationwatch UK showed official figures from the Office for National Statistics confirm the trend towards 70 million by the year 2031.

Mr Woolas had seized on a fall in net migration revealed last week to claim that population growth was slowing.

But MigrationwatchUK found 35,000 asylum seekers and visitors who decide to stay in Britain increased that figure. It showed that immigration was adding 153,000 people to the population every year.

The Office for National Statistics had predicted that a net migration of 130,000 a year would mean a population of 69.2 million by 2031.

Sir Andrew Green, chairman of MigrationwatchUK, said: “There are bound to be uncertainties about both birth rates and immigration but it is thoroughly irresponsible to dismiss projections that have been carefully arrived at. continues here

IMMIGRANT BABY BOOM

A BABY boom among immigrant families has helped send Britain’s population soaring over 61 million for the first time in history.


Last year’s increase of 408,000 is the biggest for nearly half a century, Government figures revealed yesterday.

Immigrant mothers now give birth to one in every four babies born in the UK. In London, more than half of all births – 55 per cent – are to mothers born overseas.

Half a million newcomers came to live in Britain during 2008 while asylum claims increased by four per cent between April and June this year, the Office for National Statistics revealed.

Yet Immigration Minister Phil Woolas last night claimed: “The British people can be confident that immigration is under control.”

His astonishing remark provoked fresh outrage over Labour’s open-door border policy, with critics denouncing his words as “spin”.Immigrant mothers now give birth to one in every four babies born in the UK. In London, more than half of all births – 55 per cent – are to mothers born overseas.

Sir Andrew Green, of think tank Migrationwatch, said: “This is a ridiculous claim. The population is heading inexorably towards the

70 million mark within 25 years.” The official figures released yesterday showed that Britain’s population is now 61.4 million, two million more than in 2001.

Government statisticians said the rise was due to a baby boom resulting from the highest fertility rates in a generation. A relatively high birth rate among the growing number of immigrant families was a significant factor.

Of the 791,000 babies born in the UK last year, 24 per cent had immigrant mothers. Overwhelmingly, they were from Pakistan, India or Poland.

Immigration figures yesterday showed only a slight reduction in the number of people coming to live in the UK despite the economic downturn.

A total of 512,000 people arrived during 2008, compared with 527,000 in 2007.

Last year’s influx included 441,000 non-British citizens. The drop in the rate last year was largely the result of a fall in the number of new arrivals from eastern European countries such as Poland and Slovakia – down by 28 per cent from 109,000 to 79,000.

An estimated 66,000 citizens of the former eastern bloc went home over the same period.

Overall, 118,000 more people arrived in Britain than left, the lowest net immigration figure since the EU expanded in 2004.

Ministers said the reduction was a “success” for Labour’s border policies, but Migrationwatch denounced their claims as “spin”. Sir Andrew said: “It is the usual Government spin to claim these numbers as a success for immigration policy despite the fact that foreign immigration is virtually unchanged at about half a million a year.

“What has really happened is that EU citizens have voted with their feet. The number leaving has doubled in the face of the deep recession in Britain but EU migration is something over which the Government have no control whatever.”

Damian Green, Shadow Immigration Minister, said: “These figures expose the dishonesty of Gordon Brown’s promise to provide British jobs for British workers. At a time of rising unemployment the numbers of new people coming here to work are 34 per cent higher than at the height of the boom 10 years ago.

“This puts added pressure on housing and transport, and shows that there is still no proper control over immigration.”

Former Labour minister Frank Field and senior Tory backbencher Nicholas Soames, of the Cross Party Group on Balanced Migration, said: “The fall in net migration may well be temporary – as in previous recessions – but even at the present level of immigration we are still on target for the UK’s population to exceed 70 million within 25 years. There are no laurels to rest on. The need for firm measures on immigration is unchanged.”

The population is now growing by a rate of 0.7 per cent every year, more than double the rate in the 1990s and three times the level of the 1980s, the figures confirm. And the number of work permits handed out to immigrants also remained relatively high, despite Britain’s jobs crisis.

The total number of work permit holders admitted to the UK was 81,400 in 2008, compared with 53,600 in 1999, an increase of 34 per cent.

Border and Immigration Minister Mr Woolas said: “The fall in net migration is further proof that migrants come to the UK for short periods, work, contribute to the economy and then return home.

“Our new flexible points-based system gives us greater control on those coming to work or study from outside Europe. continues here

English-speaking pupils are a minority in inner-city London primary schools

Children who speak English as their first language are now a minority in inner-city London primary schools, official figures showed yesterday.

Youngsters with a different mother tongue form a majority in primaries in 13 out of 33 London boroughs and in nearby Slough.

In inner London, 54 per cent of primary pupils and 48.5 per cent in secondary institutions do not speak English as their first language. This amounts to an astonishing 159,340 children.

Across the country, English is a foreign language to more than one in seven primary youngsters - almost half a million.

The figures from the Department for Children, Schools and Families point to the major demographic changes over the past few decades. Around a fifth of pupils are from ethnic minorities - up from 11 per cent in 1997.

There are concerns that school finances are under strain as growing numbers of youngsters require help with English.

Heads' leaders have urged the Government to fund schools adequately and give fair treatment during inspections to those with large concentrations of non-English speakers.

The figures show there are 14 council areas in which primary children with English as their second language are in the majority - 13 London boroughs and Slough.

In Tower Hamlets almost four out of five youngsters do not have English as their mother tongue. In other areas, including Leicester, Luton and Bradford the proportion is approaching 50 per cent.

For primaries overall, 15.2 per cent are non-native English speakers - up from 14.4 per cent last year.
Enlarge

The figures indicate that many recent migrants have settled in London. The lowest populations of youngsters with English as a second language are in the South West and North East.

Sir Andrew Green, of the Migrationwatch think-tank, said: 'These figures confirm the huge impact immigration is having on our society.

When Government funds are as tight as they are, this is bound to have a negative impact as children with English as an additional language will need extra tuition.'

He added: 'In inner London it's hard to know who immigrant children are supposed to integrate with since they heavily outnumber local children.'

The figures reflect a five-fold increase in immigration since Labour came to power. Net immigration has increased from 48,000 in 1997 to 237,000 in 2007 continues here

Do you consider the actions of both this government and others, to be genocide against the indigenous people?