You can't deport me, I'm a lesbian: Jamaican drug dealer makes human rights plea

A drug dealer is appealing against her deportation on the grounds it will violate her human rights as a lesbian.

The Jamaican argues she will be persecuted for her homosexuality if she is returned to her home country at the end of her sentence.

She had a boyfriend before her conviction for supplying class-A drugs, but has since had several same-sex lovers in prison.

Yesterday the Court of Appeal heard that the woman, called A for legal reasons, wants to stay in the UK where she says she has found love with a fellow inmate.

But the Home Office refuses to accept the relationship is genuine and said it was just a ruse to get her deportation order returned.

They argue her same-sex relations were merely the result of the lack of male alternatives - similar to one of the lesbian flings depicted in prison dramas such as Bad Girls. Her case is set to cost the taxpayer tens of thousands of pounds.

A, who is 24, was introduced to drugs by a former boyfriend, but since her conviction in 2005 she claims to have had at least six lesbian lovers.

She says in Jamaica she faces the threat of criminal gangs who would set out to kill her because of her homosexuality.

Her legal case is that deporting her would violate her rights to life, freedom of expression, a private life and freedom from discrimination.

But the Home Office believes her alleged relationship is 'part and parcel of a campaign to be allowed to stay in the UK'.

They claim that as A's alleged girlfriend is also Jamaican, there is nothing stopping the couple returning to the Caribbean and setting up home there together.

The Court of Appeal was told that A met the woman she says she loves while they were both inmates at Downview, in Surrey.

Carine Patry Hoskins, for the Home Office, said that it 'did not accept' that the relationship was genuine.

She added that it was little surprise that A had been a lesbian when in prison. 'If she wanted to be sexually active, there was no other option,' she said. 'There was no other choice but celibacy.'

A, who is fighting her case using legal aid, said she was 'lost and frightened' when she left Jamaica as a teenager, but is now more confident-about who she is.

She says she had homosexual and heterosexual relationships before being imprisoned, but had become 'more socially confident' behind bars, and as a result, had confirmed in her mind her lesbianism.

She is challenging her deportation notice, served earlier this year. Her barrister, S Chelvan, said that as a lesbian she would be in danger if returned to Jamaica.

He also attacked the Home Office for withdrawing two concessions it had made to A before her asylum appeal was heard.

Mr Chelvan said officials had agreed that if it was found she was a lesbian then she would be 'at risk' in Jamaica, and had also accepted she was in a lesbian relationship.

He said the Home Office's behaviour was a 'public disgrace' and had 'undermined public confidence' in the immigration system. continues here

What does it matter to us, Miss A is not from here, it is not up to the UK to protect the rights of the world, it is or should be, the responsibility of individual governments, this country is a prime destination for mules, individuals who transport drugs into this country by all means, even by the use of their own bodies. Then of course, once the drug is in the country it is dispersed down the ladder, each respective step receiving a cut, in many cases the drug is mixed with all sorts of agents, just to make a quick buck, the end result is abject misery upon the streets of this country.

Nationalism holds a special hatred for drugs, always has, even so-called “soft” drugs have no place in our society, yet here we are talking about class-A drugs, substances with the very real potential to kill, certainly they blight our country, as do those that bring them in. A leftist would contend that the mules, drug-dealers, are victims to, generally poor, therefore forced by dint of circumstances to undertake such ventures, this holds no weight. European or European descended nations have experienced depressions, situations whereby citizens of said nations are rendered destitute, penniless and forced to survive in any way, do such people, load themselves up with drugs and head east, do they blight non-white countries and their communities, no they do not.

Under a nationalist government there would be a huge crackdown on drugs, supplying drugs, dependent upon the type, is akin to attempted murder and would be treated as such, nations who permitted their citizens, to persistently endeavour to breach our borders, with intent to supply, would face sanction and other measures, for surely it is not the responsibility of destination countries to police foreign borders. Under a people-friendly nationalist government, drugs, as much as can be, would be eradicated from public life, of course initially our measures would be somewhat harsh, yet if we save just one life, are not our policies just? Go home Miss A…

Church 'out of touch' as public supports equal rights for homosexuals

A revolution in attitudes towards gay men and lesbians is indicated in a poll which shows that a majority of the public want homosexuals to share identical rights to everyone else.

Just 40 years after homosexual acts were legalised, and only nine years since the age of consent was equalised, 61 per cent of the public want gay couples to be able to marry just like the rest of the population, not just have civil partnerships.

Half (49 per cent) believe that gay couples should have equal adoption rights, eight years after it became legal for them to adopt in a highly controversial move by Tony Blair.

Some Roman Catholic adoption agencies are fighting to retain the right to turn away gay couples, which they are now specifically prohibited from doing.

But perhaps the most surprising discovery is that 51 per cent of the public want children to be taught in school that gay relationships are of equal value to marriage.

The famous row over Section 28, which prevented the “promotion” of homosexuality in schools was a defining moment in the 1980s. It was only repealed in 2003. Iain Duncan Smith, the Conservative leader at the time, and dozens of Tory MPs opposed it.

Overall, 68 per cent of the public back “full equal rights” for gay men and lesbians, suggesting that the Church, the final bastion of formal discrimination, is out of touch with public opinion.

Although last month the Church of Scotland upheld the election of the first openly gay minister, the Church of England is still split over the issue. No practising homosexual has been put forward as a candidate for a bishopric since Geoffrey John was proposed, then rejected, as Bishop of Reading.

Clergy can be openly gay provided they affirm to their bishop that the relationship is celibate.

However, the poll found a sizable minority think using the term “gay” as an insult is acceptable. Over a third of the public say they are happy to use the phrase “a bit gay” or have friends who use the term.

The poll, conducted by Populus, was commissioned by The Times to commemorate the Stonewall Riots 40 years ago. A series of spontaneous, violent demonstrations started on June 28, 1969, at the Stonewall Inn, in the Greenwich Village district of New York. They were triggered by a police raid on the inn, a gay bar run by the Mafia, and are considered a defining event that marked the start of the gay rights movement in the United States and Britain.

The past decade has seen a flurry of equality legislation — equalising the age of consent at 16, the introduction of civil partnerships and the right to enjoy equal provision of goods and services. Although that was intended to prevent hoteliers or holiday companies discriminating against gays, it also covered public services, so adoption agencies were forced to allow gay couples on to their books.

After a ferocious Cabinet battle, in which ministers who were practising Catholics argued that Catholic agencies should be exempt from the legislation, it was agreed that they should be given time to adjust their working practices. Most have agreed to do this, even though it has meant formally splitting from the Church and changing their fund-raising structures. Others are still battling in the courts.

Ben Summerskill, chief executive of Stonewall, the gay charity, said be believed the introduction of civil partnerships in 2005 particularly helped to shift attitudes.

“Suddenly millions of people realised gay people want to get married just like everyone else, and have slightly excitable ceremonies where aunties end up rowing, just like everyone else,” he said.

“It comes up time and time again when I meet people who have been to civil partnership ceremonies or have heard of friends or neighbours having them.”

He said that the most notable finding was the backing for teaching about homosexual relationships in schools.

“That was the most pleasant surprise from this poll. In this matter it is parents who are the ones who matter and clearly they are much more realistic about the wider world than veteran opponents of equality. continues here

Canterbury is sufficiently gay, council inspectors rule

One of Britain's most historic cities, Canterbury, has been told it is sufficiently gay – after a complaint sparked a two-month investigation costing thousands of pounds.

A government watchdog decided that Canterbury in Kent does enough to promote homosexual culture, rejecting a complaint by local activists.

The Local Government Ombudsman – who asked for the city's council to provide evidence of how it supported the gay community – said it was satisfied the pink pound was being catered for.

As part of the investigation, the council had to prove its inclusiveness by giving details of "touring plays and musicals, for example, which would be of interest to the LGBT community".

And it had to show that it had "put forward suggestions for small events that it might help fund, as well as proposals for other events such as exhibitions".

Rob Davies, spokesman for the council, said: "Obviously we're delighted with the outcome of the investigation.

"We feel we do a great deal for the gay community in Canterbury and we have always tried to support various gay events and promotions."

"But at the same time it is not the duty of any council to set up a gay bar – that's not what councils do."

The two-month investigation began at the end of April after a letter was sent from two representatives of Pride in Canterbury.

Chairman Andrew Brettell lodged a formal complaint with the Local Government Ombudsman claiming his initial letter to the council in November fell on deaf ears.

Mr Brettell, in his 60s, said last month: "" We do not believe the council want a thriving LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender) community in our city. The impression I get is that the council just doesn't want to know. continues here

Gay marriage row at Miss USA show

The runner-up at the Miss USA beauty pageant says her outspoken opposition to gay marriage cost her first place in the competition.

During the televised event, Carrie Prejean - Miss California - said she believed that "a marriage should be between a man and a woman".

She had been asked for her views on the subject by one of the judges, celebrity blogger Perez Hilton.

"It did cost me my crown," said Ms Prejean, after the competition.

The eventual winner of the pageant was Kristen Dalton, Miss North Carolina.

'Alienated'

"We live in a land where you can choose same-sex marriage or opposite marriage," said Ms Prejean, in a section of the show that has become a popular clip on YouTube.

"I believe that a marriage should be between a man and a woman," she continued.

"No offence to anybody out there, but that's how I was raised."

The remarks drew a mixture of booing and applause from the audience.

Speaking after the show, which was broadcast on Sunday evening in the US, Ms Prejean said: "I wouldn't have had it any other way. I said what I feel. I stated an opinion that was true to myself and that's all I can do."

Hilton said he had been "floored" by Ms Prejean's answer, which, he said, "alienated millions of gay and lesbian Americans, their families and their supporters".

He told ABC News: "She lost it because of that question. She was definitely the front-runner before that."

Keith Lewis, who runs the Miss California competition, released a statement condemning Ms Prejean's comments.

"As co-director of the Miss California USA, I am personally saddened and hurt that Miss California believes marriage rights belong only to a man and a woman."continues here

So what is all the fuss you might ask and does it matter, its irrelevant really isn’t it? Well yes and no, yes because beauty pageants are relatively meaningless, other than for we men to ogle the various eye-candy and after all, whether leftists like it or not that is how we are, exactly as nature intended. Oh feminists may bewail, bemoan and be-something however, who really cares, appreciation of the female form will forever be commonplace and they, for all their desires of changing by force natures design, can never hope to succeed, that is until they invent a “everyone’s homosexual pill”, so no it doesn’t matter.

In the real scheme of things beauty pageants or competitions don’t matter at all however, as remarked upon below, concerning Miss Lawal, sometimes, just sometimes, they highlight conflict, underline chasms within wider society. In this case we get to witness the vilification of the old world at the hands of the new, we mustn’t run from fact, homosexuality has always existed, perhaps not as promoted as now but it has always been there, although there is something unnatural about current levels and sodomites seem to exist everywhere.

Homosexuality is of course counter group and there is nothing we can ever do to make it group positive, quite simply homosexuals create no off-spring and this fact alone makes their actions anti-group and indeed anti-nature. Of course today with medical advance or egalitarianism within adoption procedure, it is highly possible that homosexuals will either be given preference or indeed create life, no thought is given of course to the poor children. You see again it is a case whereby, new ideological notions are given precedence over Mother Nature and those to come, it would seem that the only grand design we have is selfishness.

It is our duty to look to tomorrow, to safeguard and to cherish and then to pass on our heritage, our genes and our values, all of these are now under attack and to counter is to leave one open to attack. What are my views on homosexuality, well I feel sorry for them, I believe they are missing out and I believe that it is a condition, yet as a man who believes in treating people decently I believe we should treat them the same but we must not promote it, place it on an equal footing with heterosexuality, because it is not nor ever can be equal.

Such views just don’t gel, just run contrary, yet that does not for any moment make them less true, quite simply take away medical advance and what do you have, a section of society that cannot reproduce, perhaps its natures way of curtailing numbers, limiting over-population who can know. What I do know is that many homosexuals, feeling alienated from the greater group have become the groups attackers, I must stress at this point that not all gays act in this manner, just as not all Jews, ethnics of various descriptions do, however a significant proportion do, they like a large section of the Jewish community perpetually attack the group.

It is these homosexuals that I have no time for, these that stir trouble make life difficult for all, such appears to be the case with Perez Hilton, first I shall invite readers to witness the event, the event where Carrie Prejean answers Hiltons queston, which is,

“Vermont recently became the fourth state to legalize same-sex marriage. Do you think every state should follow suit? Why or why not?”

now watch the video below to view Carrie Prejeans response

then watch Perez Hilton give his opinion at this link. Here you will see the homosexual lobby, this alienated bunch of degenerates, that seek to inflict upon society as a whole, their version of normalcy, attacking us for our difference.

1. Post a comment on AAWR


2. Subscribe to AAWR


3. link to AAWR


4. Bookmark AAWR


5. View Incidence Map

Multigenerational Gay Housing Project Starts in Germany

A multigenerational living project aimed at gays and lesbians got one step closer to being realized when organizers laid a ground stone for the building this week.

Organizers of the building project Villa Anders -- which translates in English as 'A Different Kind of Villa' -- say it is a unique pioneer project in Germany.

Under a rainbow-colored logo and the motto "Better living -- we just went ahead and did it," the project is realizing its plan to build multigenerational, mixed-income living spaces for gay, lesbian and transgender singles, couples and "rainbow" families.

The idea is to live in individual homes "but still have community," said Stefan Juengst, a spokesman for the project. So far, half of the 34 apartments, due to be completed in the autumn of 2009, have been sold. 

The project is selective in terms of sexual identity, with living space available for gays, lesbians, transgenders -- and a 15 percent quota of straight people who may be part of an otherwise gay or lesbian family constellation. 

A rainbow family is "the gay equivalent of the blended family," Juegst said. "It could be all constellations -- people with children who came initially out of a heterosexual relationship, or two lesbians with a gay man together who make a deal to have children -- very different models. There are no given role models." 

But a key goal of the group is to have a mixed range of ages represented, and state funding is tied to its success. 

"Some people who live here will be students, others will spend their working years here, and still others will spend their golden years with us. We want all generations," a flyer for the project reads.

                                                        A first for Germany

Should it succeed, Villa Anders would be Germany's first such center for gay living, a fact that even Juengst acknowledges is surprising.

"There have been many attempts but they all failed," Juengst said. There was the community in Hamburg that failed because the neighborhood rejected it, and one in Frankfurt that didn't get off the ground because it was too complicated, involving a care center and an old age home. Currently, Berlin is working on a project similar to Villa Anders, but it is also different -- aimed only at homosexual men, and leaning more toward the old-age home model. 

"To my knowledge, we are the only one for both gays and lesbians," Juengst said.

Finding middle-aged people interested in the apartments has been easy, but older gays, especially gay men, "have a lot of fear -- they worry about becoming a target for violence," Juengst said.

                                                      Creating a "gay ghetto"?  

Indeed, some might question whether creating a multigenerational living project for gays and lesbians is the right direction to move for a city that is already known for being a European gay capital. Do such mono-culture projects help bring about integration -- or create a ghetto-like atmosphere that detracts from it?

Projects organizers insist that the Villa Anders community is not going to be a "gay ghetto" or contribute to anti-gay sentiment in Cologne. Rather, it will be a first chance for many of them to be themselves, without fear.

"The alternative for so many gays and lesbians, especially older ones, is to live hidden in plain sight, in the middle of the rest of society," Juengst said. "Maybe people whisper about them, or some even live openly. But many just feel they cannot be themselves."  continues here

Plans to remove bushes from beauty spot spark discrimination claims - because they're popular haunts for gay couples

"Last year four firefighters were disciplined for allegedly disturbing a group of men at night by shining their torches into the bushes on the Downs. 

After complaints that their actions were homophobic, the four senior officers from Avon Fire Service were fined and transferred to other stations."

Most visitors to a popular beauty spot would welcome overgrown bushes being cut back. 

But a council had to tread carefully after being told that to some members of the gay community, the dense undergrowth was something to be protected. 

Removing it would discriminate against the gay men who use the area for outdoor sex, campaigners claimed. 

Visitors to the Downs near Bristol's spectacular Avon Gorge have complained about the 'inappropriate sexual activity', which can be punishable by up to six months in prison. 

Despite this, the city council was forced to consult gay rights groups about their concerns over its plan to clear away the bushes to improve the scenery and protect rare wildlife. 

Tory councillor Peter Abraham said yesterday: 'How can it be discriminatory to clear land that might stop what is an illegal practice? 

'We need to manage the Downs properly. For a long time we have been told that the scrubland needs to be opened up.

'I find it offensive to suggest that by taking this action - which might stop people collecting to carry out what some might describe as illegal acts and certainly offensive behaviour - you are being discriminatory.' 

The Downs are home to various species of rare plants and wildlife, but parts have become overgrown over the past two decades. 

Thick bushes cover the secluded area next to Circular Road, where men are frequently seen cruising for sexual partners. 

Plans to clear the land were proposed three years ago and put out to consultation, which included considering the views of the Rainbow Group of lesbian, gay and bisexual council staff. 

A report on the plans states: 'As part of the consultation, concerns were expressed by the council's lesbian-gay and bisexual group (and a small number of other consultees) that this action was potentially discriminating against gay and bisexual men whose activities on this part of the Downs were objected to by other members of the local community and Downs users.' 

Council officials then had to consult the police and HIV charity the Terrence Higgins Trust to ensure there was no discrimination.

Peter Wilkinson, Bristol City Council's head of parks, said yesterday: 'The general public are unhappy about people taking part in lewd behaviour in public spaces, whether it's between men and women or people of the same sex. 

'We are working together with the Terrence Higgins Trust to make sure any work we will do is sensitive. 

'We're making sure people know what we are doing so we are not seen to be discriminating.' 

Work to remove the bushes as part of a £20,000 five-year maintenance scheme approved in January 2007 will begin in the next three months. 

The Rainbow Group refused to comment yesterday, but said it stood by the comments made in the report. 

A spokesman for Bristol City Council said: 'The Downs management committee, like all good landlords, agreed a programme of maintenance for the trees and shrubbery on Circular Road.

'At the time of the consultation some members of the Rainbow Group expressed concerns it could be potentially discriminating.