We hear the chorus constantly, “free speech, free speech”, they shout it from the roof-tops, write about it and eulogise it yet they hypocritically impede it, it would seem that populist nationalism is as bad as the lefts “no platform” policy, a policy that closes off all avenues of sensible debate. Recently I posted upon Stormfront, a purported white nationalist discussion forum, a forum now apparently given over to pro-BNP sycophants, this coterie of fools seek to change nationalism, seek to alter its core values in order to squeeze their way into office. Not for them true freedom of speech, not for them correct nationalism, not for them the addressing of real issues, just a miserable betrayal of principles, a corruption of all we have ever stood for.
They seem to think that nationalism must be shaped to their agenda that it must warp and twist and slither its way to power, that our people so brain-washed must be betrayed further still and that traditional nationalism has failed. It is this argument that they seem fixated upon, this so-called failure, yet I have never lived in such times, times in which, even those possessed of little knowledge concerning nationalism seek change, when the populace cry out for truth native justice and liberty. Into this steps the BNP blowing the trumpet of populism, “rally to us”, they cry, “we will save you”, give us your money first, give us your money and we will save you”, constantly we hear, read and see this call, still salvation seems a long way off.
Many nu-nationalists cry, “why don’t you go then, if you don’t like our polices and our direction”, yet many of us were there years ago, many of us were that now most disparaged of individuals, true nationalists and we had them you know, the left ran scared and contrived to turn our youth, a job they have again succeeded at. Today our young parade as Negroes, resplendent in their garb, not for them pride, not for them love of own and who can blame them, successive governments have hounded white males, placed newcomers above them and send them to the back of the line, our country does not as yet deserve its youth.
Yet nu-nationalism offers nothing, nothing at all it sells-out every principle, its motto power at any cost, yet such a motto by definition is not people friendly, does not represent nationalism as I and others know it and attracts those interested in personal power, rather than those motivated by kind. When nu-nationalists say, “if you don’t like it join another party”, they know full well that there is as yet nothing else, that they have kidnapped the brand, taken the banner to which the naïve rush in droves. To set up a party takes money, takes organisation, publicity, time and it is time we do not have, we no longer have the time simple demographics tell us that, yet they have stolen our clothes and expect us to accept it.
When one looks to other smaller parties, it is easy to see the hand of our enemies in keeping them small, for they know full well that the timid populace will not turn to them, there is strength in numbers you see and we are still social animals. Should thousands march tomorrow the country is ours, yes surely blood will flow as the apparatus defends itself but even so, should the people arise then they have lost. To forestall this, especially now at this time, they create pleasant nationalism, new non-threatening nationalism, this nationalism mutes the people’s anger channels it in a useless direction, permitting the dark state to continue its Machiavellian plans.
Yet it is a multi-faceted task, which cannot just involve a hijacked party, coupled with the rise of nu-nationalism their must be an alien enemy, most BNP members are true nationalists after all and even a fool can see the non-white colonisation of white lands, so into this mix they place the Muslim. Why the Muslim, well you see the Muslim ticks all the boxes, firstly as I have previously written about, Islam contests and rejects usury, secondly, in the main it is still a non-white religion, thirdly it is a cohesive group and when attacked will retaliate, therefore racheting up hatred, fourthly, it is traditionalist in outlook, therefore it clashes daily with western sensibilities, most importantly though, it is a non-white face, an alien creed and a representation of all non-white immigration, it is therefore an easy target, a perfect channel for native anger.
So here we have the BNP, a once nativist party, now vehemently anti-Islamic, we have the purported right-wing press all decrying Islam, we have a native population reeling from wave after wave of detrimental immigration, angry and bitter and easily swayed, we have the promotion of non-Christianity, usually involving Islam. We have Muslim individuals suing all and sundry, to further augment seething anger, we have a created organisation Al-Qaeda, we have atrocities committed in Islam’s name yes it is all very easy, to channel the people’s anger in the required direction.
Moreover, we have the relentless attack upon true nationalism, a creed hounded wherever they can be found, vilified, reviled and disparaged, there is reason you see, true nationalism seeks no war with Islam, true nationalism to, contests the money powers. True nationalism would see all live in peace within their own lands and this simply will not do. You see to introduce a new order, one must first have chaos, must first have anger, bloodshed and yes perhaps war, the people weary from it all, will embrace any system that takes such chaos away, they will forego all freedoms to maintain order, endure any restriction for safety.
The greatest power, at least in swaying the people is the owned press, this organ has almost infinite power, global reach and reaches into every home placed at the disposal of tyranny the media is the ultimate weapon, holding the ability to channel anger at any given target. Running out of recruits, run an exciting ad-campaign; wish to stoke up anti-Muslim sentiment run an “Al-Qaeda terrorists in your town story” or better yet, “look what they have and you don’t” or indeed, “Christmas offends Islam”, story a sure-fire way of stoking that much needed fire. Native anger getting out of hand, run a “six million died story”, or indeed a “Nazi’s under the bed” or “teaching your children story”, perhaps get the leader of a populist party to address anti-Islamic issues, get that anger channelled before it spreads, a kind of damage limitation exercise.
Yes the media is a fantastic tool, control it and control the people, although overt control works in the opposite manner, most do not even realise the press is used in such a way, to most such a concept is conspiratorial in the extreme and proponents of such theories near mad-men. Such intelligent, non-delusional individuals never seem to sit back and realise that all media is controlling, why if it had no power we would all wear what we like, having no wish for little crocodiles, ticks or other branded goods. We would have no adverts on TV, as they would simply not work and football players would not wear shirts emblazoned by sponsors, whilst kicking balls on a billboard surrounded ground.
No if it were but conspiracy theory, then there would be no advertising industry at all and none of us would be,” worth it”, shop-lifters wouldn’t target certain goods whilst leaving others on the shelve, certain brands of razors wouldn’t need chip protection, whilst others require none and mothers wouldn’t go to Iceland.
The media then presents the required image; true nationalism is presented as beyond the pale, whilst this new breed is somewhat more tolerated, the media attack Islam, white immigrants from say Poland but never contest non-white immigration, never place blame where it should be. Instead we are trained, trained to react, a term that has come to be known as social engineering, we react exactly as they would have us do. Now given the above, imagine if correct nationalism were portrayed as evil, indulged in by dullards and socially deficient individuals, would many wish association, would any risk the social smear, of course not ,therefore nationalistically correct parties remain small and sanctioned safety valves augment.
If said safety valve sings from the same hymn-book as others all the better, the problem will centre around one particular issue, whilst the real issues are over-looked until too late. This in effect is the circumstance now, true nationalism has no voice, no platform, be that be via our own so-called rightist forums, debating platforms, literature, parties or indeed any mechanism delivering a message, as stated in an earlier post, purported rightist sites/weblogs refuse to add true nationalist links to their sites, in effect this is the same “no platform” policy as adopted by the left. The “no platform” policy was adopted primarily because in the final analysis they simply cannot counter the rights argument, coupled with this the truth of our message has the potential of resonating with the people, this can not be permitted and so we are denied a platform, denied, as they like to put it, the “oxygen of publicity”,
Yet this very behaviour is commonplace in nu-nationalist circles, they cannot debate, they cannot defend, so they must censor, disparage and ignore, regrettably for them nationalism will not go away, it will not simply fade quietly, diluting overnight into populism, at least not for some time yet. Eventually of course they will win, of course they will, new recruits automatically go to the biggest party and should such a party preach falsehood then how will they ever know truth, correct nationalism is never debated, forever denied a platform and so they are denied knowledge in effect lied to. This then is the reason seasoned and knowledgeable nationalists contest this reprehensible creed, quite simply because it negates our defence, directs it at the wrong target, lies to our people and leaves them defenceless, oh if it were just about the name, if it were but that.
You proudly declare you are the biggest party, a claim that is correct but it was true nationalism that made it so, we were never like you, with your weasel words, your lust for power, your betrayal of all on the road to it. You claim we have to alter principle, what you really mean is forego ideology, invent in effect a new one, your greatest lie is that it simply does not work for the people that it has failed, if this is so why The Public Order Act 1936 or the race relations act of 65, 68, 76 and finally 2000 and 2003, if true nationalism does not work why do they have this “no platform” policy, why do you. Correct nationalism does not need to surrender to tyranny, if it fails then it should fail on merit, not because it is given a bad press, smeared by left and right and left voiceless.
It is hypocrisy in the extreme to state that correct nationalism has failed, given that it has never had chance, this country of all others should it turn to nationalism then their order is lost and all will turn to truth. They fight tooth and nail, to prevent nationalism taking hold in this country more so than any other, in this regard we are unique amongst nations, being as we are the mother of most. Nu-nationalism does the work of great evil paints defence as malevolent and truth as lies, it kneels to the moneymen and caters to abject tyranny, more than this though it betrays us at the eleventh hour. The clock ticks and we await our doom, our cause corrupted unable to function, big-fish swim in little ponds and all await destiny, are we to die then, submit, let them take us, have we no right to exist, no right to continue, am I to look to my children and betray them.
Am I to remain quiet whilst malevolence masquerades as nationalism, nationalism our only hope, so broken now, so useless, we fool ourselves believing that we have chance, if nu-nationalism wins what will it have won, will not non-whites colonies still exist ,will not the moneymen still prey ,will not our doom be still as sealed. But what if true nationalism wins, non-whites living in peace in their own milieu, the power of money harnessed to nation and people, freedom liberty under the law, the criminal harried and the law-abiding unmolested. Employment, a home for all, an end to interest and a return to nationhood, the building up of infrastructure of again a great nation, friendly international relations, war only in nations interest, an end to interest bearing debt, money is again merely money, never again a bond.
You must look to your nu-nationalism, what does it offer, a non-white colony that still presents overwhelming danger, what good is off-setting danger,when it should not exist ,do you think for one minute that a non-white community present as no threat. That we will not be building up our own funeral pyre, how many were on the Windrush and how many now, is it too cruel for you to see them gone, are we to die out to remain polite. Rubbish, we have a right to nation, a right to culture and a right to our distinct genotype, it matters not politeness when survival is at stake, should an assailant attack you, do you at first shake hands or do you prepare your defence.
Nu-nationalists would have you believe that it cannot be done, that those now here should remain, that Europe proper will never again be truly European, yet we have but one home, take that we are homeless, eventually by dint of numbers fated to die out. They save the elephants don’t they, they cull the badger to save the herd, protect a dam butterfly are we so very worthless, so very disposable. Nu-nationalism is an evil, it seeks to appease evil, hoodwink the people and marshal against the greater good, that is the schism, that is the great intellectual battle, if you are so big and so better, explain yourself, why must we capitulate, why must we stand-off, why must we surrender our living space, our way of life and finally our genotype.
You are no better than the left, you work for the same boss, are used in the same way, waving your dam flags and killing us, Tories for a new age, what good are you all, destroying our last defence when we need it most. Shall I tell you nationalism holds out promise, a chance for peace, a chance to again flow with nature instead of against, over time, most although not all, of the damage can be absorbed, lessons learnt never to be repeated, each race culture and people living finally in peace for the betterment of all. Perhaps because I follow traditional nationalism, true nationalism the “no platform” policy is in play, perhaps because I am not taken in by lies and treachery, perhaps because true nationalism still holds threat I and others must be quietened, as I have said, yesterday I posted upon Stormfront, a moderator seemingly took offence at my position, citing copyright infringement he cut my post, this has never happened before and I have posted similar items, at the same time my admittedly anti-populist post was censored, Green-arrow an avowed pro-populist had a post of some considerable length, having acknowledged it was not his own work, this post was not censored in any way.
Nor should it be however, given that the pro-populist moderator permits others of like-mind to post lengthy articles, whilst those opposed to such, are unashamedly censored, further in remonstrating with the deplorable individual, my account was suspended and we should have pro-populists upon Stormfront? It begs the question as to whether populism should stick to the BNP/Green Arrow forum and leave us somewhere for ourselves, certainly Stormfront is alleged to be a white nationalist forum, which is clearly not the case under such conditions.
Perhaps it would be better for certain moderating tasks to entail mass agreement, for instance, how can it be that a moderator I feel to be wrong to then have the power to suspend my account, merely for calling him foolish for draconian censorship, better then and acceptable to myself and others that other moderators be contacted and asked their opinion in such matters. Further should posts be locked merely because a moderator disagrees with it, certainly should it go against guidelines or disparages, yet the post in question did neither, I believe that it is part of the drive to deny white nationalists a platform and as such represents dire circumstance for nationalsm generally.
Certainly I do not need Stormfront, it needs white nationalists, drive us away and you are left with nothing, this is regrettably becoming evident, perhaps the allocation of moderators should be more considered, more measured, more white nationalist. It may be the case that populists and nationalists may never see eye to eye and perhaps board policies need looking at to reflect this, I would hope that you do not shoot the messenger, innocent individual that they are. 14
They seem to think that nationalism must be shaped to their agenda that it must warp and twist and slither its way to power, that our people so brain-washed must be betrayed further still and that traditional nationalism has failed. It is this argument that they seem fixated upon, this so-called failure, yet I have never lived in such times, times in which, even those possessed of little knowledge concerning nationalism seek change, when the populace cry out for truth native justice and liberty. Into this steps the BNP blowing the trumpet of populism, “rally to us”, they cry, “we will save you”, give us your money first, give us your money and we will save you”, constantly we hear, read and see this call, still salvation seems a long way off.
Many nu-nationalists cry, “why don’t you go then, if you don’t like our polices and our direction”, yet many of us were there years ago, many of us were that now most disparaged of individuals, true nationalists and we had them you know, the left ran scared and contrived to turn our youth, a job they have again succeeded at. Today our young parade as Negroes, resplendent in their garb, not for them pride, not for them love of own and who can blame them, successive governments have hounded white males, placed newcomers above them and send them to the back of the line, our country does not as yet deserve its youth.
Yet nu-nationalism offers nothing, nothing at all it sells-out every principle, its motto power at any cost, yet such a motto by definition is not people friendly, does not represent nationalism as I and others know it and attracts those interested in personal power, rather than those motivated by kind. When nu-nationalists say, “if you don’t like it join another party”, they know full well that there is as yet nothing else, that they have kidnapped the brand, taken the banner to which the naïve rush in droves. To set up a party takes money, takes organisation, publicity, time and it is time we do not have, we no longer have the time simple demographics tell us that, yet they have stolen our clothes and expect us to accept it.
When one looks to other smaller parties, it is easy to see the hand of our enemies in keeping them small, for they know full well that the timid populace will not turn to them, there is strength in numbers you see and we are still social animals. Should thousands march tomorrow the country is ours, yes surely blood will flow as the apparatus defends itself but even so, should the people arise then they have lost. To forestall this, especially now at this time, they create pleasant nationalism, new non-threatening nationalism, this nationalism mutes the people’s anger channels it in a useless direction, permitting the dark state to continue its Machiavellian plans.
Yet it is a multi-faceted task, which cannot just involve a hijacked party, coupled with the rise of nu-nationalism their must be an alien enemy, most BNP members are true nationalists after all and even a fool can see the non-white colonisation of white lands, so into this mix they place the Muslim. Why the Muslim, well you see the Muslim ticks all the boxes, firstly as I have previously written about, Islam contests and rejects usury, secondly, in the main it is still a non-white religion, thirdly it is a cohesive group and when attacked will retaliate, therefore racheting up hatred, fourthly, it is traditionalist in outlook, therefore it clashes daily with western sensibilities, most importantly though, it is a non-white face, an alien creed and a representation of all non-white immigration, it is therefore an easy target, a perfect channel for native anger.
So here we have the BNP, a once nativist party, now vehemently anti-Islamic, we have the purported right-wing press all decrying Islam, we have a native population reeling from wave after wave of detrimental immigration, angry and bitter and easily swayed, we have the promotion of non-Christianity, usually involving Islam. We have Muslim individuals suing all and sundry, to further augment seething anger, we have a created organisation Al-Qaeda, we have atrocities committed in Islam’s name yes it is all very easy, to channel the people’s anger in the required direction.
Moreover, we have the relentless attack upon true nationalism, a creed hounded wherever they can be found, vilified, reviled and disparaged, there is reason you see, true nationalism seeks no war with Islam, true nationalism to, contests the money powers. True nationalism would see all live in peace within their own lands and this simply will not do. You see to introduce a new order, one must first have chaos, must first have anger, bloodshed and yes perhaps war, the people weary from it all, will embrace any system that takes such chaos away, they will forego all freedoms to maintain order, endure any restriction for safety.
The greatest power, at least in swaying the people is the owned press, this organ has almost infinite power, global reach and reaches into every home placed at the disposal of tyranny the media is the ultimate weapon, holding the ability to channel anger at any given target. Running out of recruits, run an exciting ad-campaign; wish to stoke up anti-Muslim sentiment run an “Al-Qaeda terrorists in your town story” or better yet, “look what they have and you don’t” or indeed, “Christmas offends Islam”, story a sure-fire way of stoking that much needed fire. Native anger getting out of hand, run a “six million died story”, or indeed a “Nazi’s under the bed” or “teaching your children story”, perhaps get the leader of a populist party to address anti-Islamic issues, get that anger channelled before it spreads, a kind of damage limitation exercise.
Yes the media is a fantastic tool, control it and control the people, although overt control works in the opposite manner, most do not even realise the press is used in such a way, to most such a concept is conspiratorial in the extreme and proponents of such theories near mad-men. Such intelligent, non-delusional individuals never seem to sit back and realise that all media is controlling, why if it had no power we would all wear what we like, having no wish for little crocodiles, ticks or other branded goods. We would have no adverts on TV, as they would simply not work and football players would not wear shirts emblazoned by sponsors, whilst kicking balls on a billboard surrounded ground.
No if it were but conspiracy theory, then there would be no advertising industry at all and none of us would be,” worth it”, shop-lifters wouldn’t target certain goods whilst leaving others on the shelve, certain brands of razors wouldn’t need chip protection, whilst others require none and mothers wouldn’t go to Iceland.
The media then presents the required image; true nationalism is presented as beyond the pale, whilst this new breed is somewhat more tolerated, the media attack Islam, white immigrants from say Poland but never contest non-white immigration, never place blame where it should be. Instead we are trained, trained to react, a term that has come to be known as social engineering, we react exactly as they would have us do. Now given the above, imagine if correct nationalism were portrayed as evil, indulged in by dullards and socially deficient individuals, would many wish association, would any risk the social smear, of course not ,therefore nationalistically correct parties remain small and sanctioned safety valves augment.
If said safety valve sings from the same hymn-book as others all the better, the problem will centre around one particular issue, whilst the real issues are over-looked until too late. This in effect is the circumstance now, true nationalism has no voice, no platform, be that be via our own so-called rightist forums, debating platforms, literature, parties or indeed any mechanism delivering a message, as stated in an earlier post, purported rightist sites/weblogs refuse to add true nationalist links to their sites, in effect this is the same “no platform” policy as adopted by the left. The “no platform” policy was adopted primarily because in the final analysis they simply cannot counter the rights argument, coupled with this the truth of our message has the potential of resonating with the people, this can not be permitted and so we are denied a platform, denied, as they like to put it, the “oxygen of publicity”,
Yet this very behaviour is commonplace in nu-nationalist circles, they cannot debate, they cannot defend, so they must censor, disparage and ignore, regrettably for them nationalism will not go away, it will not simply fade quietly, diluting overnight into populism, at least not for some time yet. Eventually of course they will win, of course they will, new recruits automatically go to the biggest party and should such a party preach falsehood then how will they ever know truth, correct nationalism is never debated, forever denied a platform and so they are denied knowledge in effect lied to. This then is the reason seasoned and knowledgeable nationalists contest this reprehensible creed, quite simply because it negates our defence, directs it at the wrong target, lies to our people and leaves them defenceless, oh if it were just about the name, if it were but that.
You proudly declare you are the biggest party, a claim that is correct but it was true nationalism that made it so, we were never like you, with your weasel words, your lust for power, your betrayal of all on the road to it. You claim we have to alter principle, what you really mean is forego ideology, invent in effect a new one, your greatest lie is that it simply does not work for the people that it has failed, if this is so why The Public Order Act 1936 or the race relations act of 65, 68, 76 and finally 2000 and 2003, if true nationalism does not work why do they have this “no platform” policy, why do you. Correct nationalism does not need to surrender to tyranny, if it fails then it should fail on merit, not because it is given a bad press, smeared by left and right and left voiceless.
It is hypocrisy in the extreme to state that correct nationalism has failed, given that it has never had chance, this country of all others should it turn to nationalism then their order is lost and all will turn to truth. They fight tooth and nail, to prevent nationalism taking hold in this country more so than any other, in this regard we are unique amongst nations, being as we are the mother of most. Nu-nationalism does the work of great evil paints defence as malevolent and truth as lies, it kneels to the moneymen and caters to abject tyranny, more than this though it betrays us at the eleventh hour. The clock ticks and we await our doom, our cause corrupted unable to function, big-fish swim in little ponds and all await destiny, are we to die then, submit, let them take us, have we no right to exist, no right to continue, am I to look to my children and betray them.
Am I to remain quiet whilst malevolence masquerades as nationalism, nationalism our only hope, so broken now, so useless, we fool ourselves believing that we have chance, if nu-nationalism wins what will it have won, will not non-whites colonies still exist ,will not the moneymen still prey ,will not our doom be still as sealed. But what if true nationalism wins, non-whites living in peace in their own milieu, the power of money harnessed to nation and people, freedom liberty under the law, the criminal harried and the law-abiding unmolested. Employment, a home for all, an end to interest and a return to nationhood, the building up of infrastructure of again a great nation, friendly international relations, war only in nations interest, an end to interest bearing debt, money is again merely money, never again a bond.
You must look to your nu-nationalism, what does it offer, a non-white colony that still presents overwhelming danger, what good is off-setting danger,when it should not exist ,do you think for one minute that a non-white community present as no threat. That we will not be building up our own funeral pyre, how many were on the Windrush and how many now, is it too cruel for you to see them gone, are we to die out to remain polite. Rubbish, we have a right to nation, a right to culture and a right to our distinct genotype, it matters not politeness when survival is at stake, should an assailant attack you, do you at first shake hands or do you prepare your defence.
Nu-nationalists would have you believe that it cannot be done, that those now here should remain, that Europe proper will never again be truly European, yet we have but one home, take that we are homeless, eventually by dint of numbers fated to die out. They save the elephants don’t they, they cull the badger to save the herd, protect a dam butterfly are we so very worthless, so very disposable. Nu-nationalism is an evil, it seeks to appease evil, hoodwink the people and marshal against the greater good, that is the schism, that is the great intellectual battle, if you are so big and so better, explain yourself, why must we capitulate, why must we stand-off, why must we surrender our living space, our way of life and finally our genotype.
You are no better than the left, you work for the same boss, are used in the same way, waving your dam flags and killing us, Tories for a new age, what good are you all, destroying our last defence when we need it most. Shall I tell you nationalism holds out promise, a chance for peace, a chance to again flow with nature instead of against, over time, most although not all, of the damage can be absorbed, lessons learnt never to be repeated, each race culture and people living finally in peace for the betterment of all. Perhaps because I follow traditional nationalism, true nationalism the “no platform” policy is in play, perhaps because I am not taken in by lies and treachery, perhaps because true nationalism still holds threat I and others must be quietened, as I have said, yesterday I posted upon Stormfront, a moderator seemingly took offence at my position, citing copyright infringement he cut my post, this has never happened before and I have posted similar items, at the same time my admittedly anti-populist post was censored, Green-arrow an avowed pro-populist had a post of some considerable length, having acknowledged it was not his own work, this post was not censored in any way.
Nor should it be however, given that the pro-populist moderator permits others of like-mind to post lengthy articles, whilst those opposed to such, are unashamedly censored, further in remonstrating with the deplorable individual, my account was suspended and we should have pro-populists upon Stormfront? It begs the question as to whether populism should stick to the BNP/Green Arrow forum and leave us somewhere for ourselves, certainly Stormfront is alleged to be a white nationalist forum, which is clearly not the case under such conditions.
Perhaps it would be better for certain moderating tasks to entail mass agreement, for instance, how can it be that a moderator I feel to be wrong to then have the power to suspend my account, merely for calling him foolish for draconian censorship, better then and acceptable to myself and others that other moderators be contacted and asked their opinion in such matters. Further should posts be locked merely because a moderator disagrees with it, certainly should it go against guidelines or disparages, yet the post in question did neither, I believe that it is part of the drive to deny white nationalists a platform and as such represents dire circumstance for nationalsm generally.
Certainly I do not need Stormfront, it needs white nationalists, drive us away and you are left with nothing, this is regrettably becoming evident, perhaps the allocation of moderators should be more considered, more measured, more white nationalist. It may be the case that populists and nationalists may never see eye to eye and perhaps board policies need looking at to reflect this, I would hope that you do not shoot the messenger, innocent individual that they are. 14
![Churchill, Hitler and the Unnecessary War](http://patbuchananbooks.com/wp-content/uploads/bk-pjb-chuw165.jpg "Churchill_Hitler_the_Unnecessary_War\")
Post a comment on AAWR
0 Responses to "No Platform"Post a Comment
We welcome contributions from all sides of the debate, at AAWR comment is free, AAWR may edit and/or delete your comments if abusive, threatening, illegal or libellous according to our understanding of, no emails will be published. Your comments may be published on other nationalist media sites worldwide.