A skull that rewrites the history of man

It has long been agreed that Africa was the sole cradle of human evolution. Then these bones were found in Georgia...

The conventional view of human evolution and how early man colonised the world has been thrown into doubt by a series of stunning palaeontological discoveries "This suggests some kind of social organisation based on mutual care..."suggesting that Africa was not the sole cradle of humankind. Scientists have found a handful of ancient human skulls at an archaeological site two hours from the Georgian capital, Tbilisi, that suggest a Eurasian chapter in the long evolutionary story of man.


The skulls, jawbones and fragments of limb bones suggest that our ancient human ancestors migrated out of Africa far earlier than previously thought and spent a long evolutionary interlude in Eurasia – before moving back into Africa to complete the story of man.

Experts believe fossilised bones unearthed at the medieval village of Dmanisi in the foothills of the Caucuses, and dated to about 1.8 million years ago, are the oldest indisputable remains of humans discovered outside of Africa.

But what has really excited the researchers is the discovery that these early humans (or "hominins") are far more primitive-looking than the Homo erectus humans that were, until now, believed to be the first people to migrate out of Africa about 1 million years ago.

The Dmanisi people had brains that were about 40 per cent smaller than those of Homo erectus and they were much shorter in stature than classical H. erectus skeletons, according to Professor David Lordkipanidze, general director of the Georgia National Museum. "Before our findings, the prevailing view was that humans came out of Africa almost 1 million years ago, that they already had sophisticated stone tools, and that their body anatomy was quite advanced in terms of brain capacity and limb proportions. But what we are finding is quite different," Professor Lordkipanidze said.

"The Dmanisi hominins are the earliest representatives of our own genus – Homo – outside Africa, and they represent the most primitive population of the species Homo erectus to date. They might be ancestral to all later Homo erectus populations, which would suggest a Eurasian origin of Homo erectus."

Speaking at the British Science Festival in Guildford, where he gave the British Council lecture, Professor Lordkipanidze raised the prospect that Homo erectus may have evolved in Eurasia from the more primitive-looking Dmanisi population and then migrated back to Africa to eventually give rise to our own species, Homo sapiens – modern man.

"The question is whether Homo erectus originated in Africa or Eurasia, and if in Eurasia, did we have vice-versa migration? This idea looked very stupid a few years ago, but today it seems not so stupid," he told the festival.

The scientists have discovered a total of five skulls and a solitary jawbone. It is clear that they had relatively small brains, almost a third of the size of modern humans. "They are quite small. Their lower limbs are very human and their upper limbs are still quite archaic and they had very primitive stone tools," Professor Lordkipanidze said. "Their brain capacity is about 600 cubic centimetres. The prevailing view before this discovery was that the humans who first left Africa had a brain size of about 1,000 cubic centimetres."

The only human fossil to predate the Dmanisi specimens are of an archaic species Homo habilis, or "handy man", found only in Africa, which used simple stone tools and lived between about 2.5 million and 1.6 million years ago.

"I'd have to say, if we'd found the Dmanisi fossils 40 years ago, they would have been classified as Homo habilis because of the small brain size. Their brow ridges are not as thick as classical Homo erectus, but their teeth are more H. erectus like," Professor Lordkipanidze said. "All these finds show that the ancestors of these people were much more primitive than we thought. I don't think that we were so lucky as to have found the first travellers out of Africa. Georgia is the cradle of the first Europeans, I would say," he told the meeting.

"What we learnt from the Dmanisi fossils is that they are quite small – between 1.44 metres to 1.5 metres tall. What is interesting is that their lower limbs, their tibia bones, are very human-like so it seems they were very good runners," he said.

He added: "In regards to the question of which came first, enlarged brain size or bipedalism, maybe indirectly this information calls us to think that body anatomy was more important than brain size. While the Dmanisi people were almost modern in their body proportions, and were highly efficient walkers and runners, their arms moved in a different way, and their brains were tiny compared to ours. continues here

Perhaps we shall never know, never know the truth, certainly important aspects, certain truths concerning our evolution are denied us, it finds, don’t you think, the agenda, this ridiculous one-worldism, this enforced charade of sameness, this rush to beat down distinctiveness and render uniqueness obsolete. They tell us now, that no, we did not hail from Africa, that it was not Homo erectus that first used tools, now we have “Dmanisi hominins”, it would seem that this group, even at that time, had created a community, it would appear an altruistic community, a trait shared predominantly by Caucasians and, Mongoloid or what we refer to here at least, as Orientals.

Negroids on the other hand do not share to the same degree, an altruistic disposition, of note also here, is the use of tools, yet I shall not get into here the anthropological differences between human sub-divisions, suffice to say that even today, valid scientific data and indeed potential advance is thwarted in the name of political correctness. This of course enables the agenda makers free reign to peddle the monstrous lie that we are all the same, save for pigmentation, however, individuals such as myself are repressed but we are not wrong, they on the other hand, have a really quite terrible job and must constantly close the lid upon truth, lest it leak out to the wider world.

No, we are not the same, far from it, we have evolved differently, separately, yet we are forced now to live together in unwanted co-existence, the shame of it is, at least currently, that it is the non-Caucasian races that would most benefit from disclosure, it is they at this moment, at least medically that stand to gain, yet treatment and drugs are denied them in order to prevent lay man realisation. Strangely at street-level the common man knows the truth, regardless of any laws, marked difference is marked difference, however, it is interesting this article in that it gives the truth to original anthropological theory, rather than the Franz Boas duplicity of today.

In much of what passes for the scientific community, even the word Caucasian is taboo and individuals from all fields, must word their conclusions carefully, yet you the people truly believe you live in a democracy, really believe that this, this is freedom. If any system is correct, then why must it fear debate, close down dissent and repress dissidents, surely debating in the full glare of the general public is the way, so that our argument can be shown to be the lie they say it is.

Would that they were honest I would have respect at least, yet they repress, cajole and gaol, this is not the way of a free society, still even in this article, they state that, although having evolved in Eurasia, that we then trekked to Africa, yet there is simply no proof of this, no proof at all and why, why on earth, would a fairly advanced species choose to do so. This finding turns Boas theory on its head in that rather than we having evolved from Homo erectus, we may have evolved separately, an unsurprising finding quite frankly.

Some consider it a racial slur, yet it is indisputable fact, that Negroid advancement was not on a par with any other race and even until fairly modern times, it was a primitive race, yet other races advanced ,some markedly and even today, the distinction is still notable. Sub-Saharan Africa is supported by the world it simply cannot function on its own, at least in these pseudo-compassionate times, for we augment their fate, simply by our meddling involvement. So does intelligence play a part or is such a notion simply, as they call it today racist, certainly even egalitarians cannot argue away the fact that the frontal lobes of both Negroes and Caucasians are different, yet what exactly does the frontal lobe do, well in simple terms it controls executive function, that is to say, it helps inhibit anti-group behaviours and governing such factors as, decision making, assessing in all its forms and impulse inhibition.

So it can be argued for instance that the Caucasian is able to resist temptation more easily than say the Negroid, this has implications for law-enforcement, inter-group association and even educational or academic ability; yet again such factors are never taken into account. Brain size does indeed factor in intelligence, the greater the volume, the greater the intelligence of the individual concerned, Negro brains are averagely smaller than that of Caucasians. However, I could go into different aspects all day and time inhibits, suffice to say ours differences are palpable, perhaps after all we have always been Europeans.

Leading geneticist Steve Jones says human evolution is over

“Small populations which are isolated can evolve at random as genes are accidentally lost. World-wide, all populations are becoming connected and the opportunity for random change is dwindling. History is made in bed, but nowadays the beds are getting closer together. We are mixing into a glo-bal mass, and the future is brown.”

Human evolution is grinding to a halt because of a shortage of older fathers in the West, according to a leading genetics expert.

Fathers over the age of 35 are more likely to pass on mutations, according to Professor Steve Jones, of University College London.

Speaking today at a UCL lecture entitled “Human evolution is over” Professor Jones will argue that there were three components to evolution – natural selection, mutation and random change. “Quite unexpectedly, we have dropped the human mutation rate because of a change in reproductive patterns,” Professor Jones told The Times.

“Human social change often changes our genetic future,” he said, citing marriage patterns and contraception as examples. Although chemicals and radioactive pollution could alter genetics, one of the most important mutation triggers is advanced age in men.

This is because cell divisions in males increase with age. “Every time there is a cell division, there is a chance of a mistake, a mutation, an error,” he said. “For a 29-year old father [the mean age of reproduction in the West] there are around 300 divisions between the sperm that made him and the one he passes on – each one with an opportunity to make mistakes.

“For a 50-year-old father, the figure is well over a thousand. A drop in the number of older fathers will thus have a major effect on the rate of mutation.”

Professor Jones added: “In the old days, you would find one powerful man having hundreds of children.” He cites the fecund Moulay Ismail of Morocco, who died in the 18th century, and is reputed to have fathered 888 children. To achieve this feat, Ismail is thought to have copulated with an average of about 1.2 women a day over 60 years.

Another factor is the weakening of natural selection. “In ancient times half our children would have died by the age of 20. Now, in the Western world, 98 per cent of them are surviving to 21.”

Decreasing randomness is another contributing factor. “Humans are 10,000 times more common than we should be, according to the rules of the animal kingdom, and we have agriculture to thank for that. Without farming, the world population would probably have reached half a million by now – about the size of the population of Glasgow. continues here

Sometimes I despair; sometimes I really can’t believe I live in such times, an age in which the rights of all others supersede that of my genotype, I have not the right to wish continuance ,should I, I am a hater, a bigot and a multitude of other names they endeavour to call me. Of course I don’t mind, its water of a ducks back, I embrace their hatred and throw it back at them, you see, I have more on my mind, more to occupy my time, than the rants of leftists.

Although I ignore them, I also despise them, loathe them, these happy killers, these crazed murders, serial killers extraordinaire, I believe I am predisposed to counter the left, genetically driven to combat them and I wouldn’t have it any other way. Yet it seems there are few though, few of us that can see through the murky waters, peer through the fog and discern truth, most seem dizzy with nonsense, bedazzled by prevaricators and busy with folly.

I stagger stunned by the realisation, that it is our time to die, we all die, for myself I do not embrace it, I do not rush for my meeting with death, yearn to feel his icy touch on my shoulder, race to cross the river, chatting aimlessly with Charon, as he takes me from those I love. Strangely the notion of death hurts, not because I am gone but for the sadness it may cause others, perhaps I am but a fool and none shall mourn my passing.

I like to believe differently, to believe that in leaving this world, at least one heart shall pine, one soul treasure memories and one mouth, flicker into a smile over times once had. We are all famous to those we love, some of us are lucky and memory of us lasts three generations, so that those that can never know us know of us, we all live forever of course, although our consciousness is no-more, we merely lend a part of ourselves to those to come, the shape of a nose, the chin, a laugh, perhaps intelligence and yes, even an illness we may pass on but pass it on we do.

Death is cruel yet life is sometimes crueller, poverty, illness any number of events, may all conspire to make of death reward, rather than a thing of dread, some go to rest with a smile others fight the event, yet we all cross the river, all of us pay the ferryman. We recoil from unfairness, the taking of a life, the murder of another, yet we are attracted to death we crane our necks at accident scenes, devour every word of macabre news-stories, fascinated, excited, scared and repulsed.

Sex sells and death sells and such will forever be the case, mankind is disposed to fight death, to contest it at every stage and we have done well, we are able to offer hope of life, where once there was none, cure ailments once mortal and ease pain, we also kill the innocent en-masse, slaughter infants, take life from the voiceless. Mankind is now a god, an un-clever god but a god nonetheless; we have complete dominion over our world to the detriment of all other animals, to the disadvantage of nature itself.

So we create death for the unborn, yet prolong life for the ill, we take from this earth yet never give, we are a malevolent Midas contaminating all we touch, most of us have no say in the workings of this world, we must place our trust in supposed better minds, we give office to representatives in hopes they cater to our need. They offer us democracy, this fable, this belief that the wishes of all can be carried through, yet sense would tell us, this can never be so, the ideas of one may be contradictory to another.

You believe it though and they, those chosen to represent you stab you in the back, they seal your fate, or that of our descendents, “the future is brown”, think about that for a minute, let it bounce around in your head, brown, now look at your children, or if none, children in your family or that of your neighbour, that is what they wish to kill off, is what by there actions they are killing off.

Yet I am the hater, I am the bigot, I am the one to be opposed, this evil scheme, these actions taken, by those who know their consequence, they know, they know the end result, no white people, no you or me. What right have they, to knowingly slaughter us, to genetically alter us in the name of their creed, have we not the right to exist, to reside upon this earth, to enjoy life, to raise our children and live in freedom?

Must they continue with this scheme unopposed, will no-one stand, no-one take up arms against true tyranny, in the history of our race, our culture we have never been so threatened, so attacked yet we let them carry through their scheme, conclude their malignant plan. We are not to survive it, this plan of theirs, this jaunt through madness, perhaps they will store our essence, our DNA, just in case, perhaps.

Yet for many this is politics, one ideology against another, a race to office that is all, for me it is a matter of survival, I don’t want them to turn us all the same, I want my children, my descendents to be the same as me, I want western civilisation to continue, I want in the final analyse, for them to simply leave us alone, let us live in peace, each in their own milieu.

Yet they give us no peace, we ask them, we tell them to stop, "no-more", we cry, in the fifties the dockers, in the seventies and eighties the front, the nineties the BNP and now we white nationalists, still they will not listen. Now though they prepare, their cameras, their surveillance, their supra-national rapid reaction force, we are almost in lockdown.

Perhaps then, regretfully, we must go out as white-men always have, surrounded, hard pressed but with pride, I can see no other way and they will surely kill us on the streets, slaughter us, should we stand against them. Of course, they must convince their forces that we are evil, that we stand against “democracy”, so perhaps white-men would not fire upon their own, yet in this age who can know.

For them it is a waiting game, breed us out of existence is the plan, or crush us should we resist, again many may die to fight leftist evil, there is a way, a chance, if we take it now, if we finally revolt throw them from office and begin again to clean up their mess. Nationalism now will not sanction it, will not countenance it, the removal of non-whites of all description and the protection of the west, for them we must agree terms, we must go softly, expect to have a non-white community in the after. Such stupidity, such an absurd notion 492 entered on the Empire Windrush, look at us now, look, open your eyes, “the future is brown”. 14