Muslims snub drive against BNP

The Muslim Council of Britain has been criticised for not supporting a multi-faith initiative designed to formulate a co-ordinated response to the BNP.

Muslim interfaith activist Fiyaz Mughal is upset at the non-attendance of MCB representatives at a meeting held under the aegis of Faith Matters at Westminster last Friday.

Mr Mughal — the Faith Matters director who was awarded an OBE in the Queen’s Birthday Honours — had invited 25 “key figures” from ethnic and religious groups to discuss the way forward after the BNP had taken two seats in the European elections.

The absence of MCB delegates was “disappointing because this was an opportunity to learn from other communities about dealing with a common enemy,” he said.

“This includes creating strategic alliances with the Jewish community so we can form a united response.”

Among those who participated in a lengthy “brainstorming” session were officials from the Board of Deputies, the Three Faiths Forum, the Community Security Trust and the European Institute for the Study of Contemporary Antisemitism. There were also representatives from the Polish, Sikh and Muslim communities.

Mr Mughal said that “an affiliation of individuals committed to fighting racism and the BNP” would be created to work with mainstream parties and educate voters about the BNP.

Phil Rosenberg, interfaith officer at the Board of Deputies, said: “There’s no room for parochialism. We need to send out a clear message that the BNP are a real threat to everyone. They work by feeding off existing tensions within a community, like worms in a hole.
“At present, our election campaigning focuses on the Jewish community.
“If we can lend our experience to help other groups carry the fight throughout the country, then that is positive for everyone.”continues here

Is it me or does becoming Jew friendly not work, I mean one only has to look at the BNP now, to see a constant effort at rapprochement in relation to the Jewish community, yet all for naught. It almost appears as if Jewry attacks from within and without, whilst nationalism is hollowed out from the core, one must always remember, that this community has been and still is the perpetual enemy of nationalism, be it here at home or elsewhere, we must never fool ourselves in this regard.

Islamic Foundation offers to guard Edinburgh Synagogue

THE CST is treating an offer from the Scottish Islamic Foundation chairman Ken Imrie to stand guard outside Edinburgh Hebrew Congregation with extreme caution.

After recent antisemitic attacks against the shul, Mr Imrie expressed his "revulsion" in a letter addressed to the shul's minister, Rabbi David Rose, and offered to "physically guard" the place of worship.

But spokesman for the CST, Mark Gardner said: "This is a curious offer indeed from the SIF, an organisation that is by no means shy when it comes to propaganda and rhetoric against Israel and its supporters."

Rabbi David Rose was unavailable for comment.  continues here

For those that don’t know, the CST or Community Security Trust is a private militia funded by shady organisations and exists primarily to fight anti-Zionism, although it classifies this as anti-Semitism. It must be remembered that no other organisation exists in such a capacity, there is quite simply no other quasi-military organisation supported by the government, given almost free reign by law enforcement agencies that exists upon the UK mainland. Whites as a community are forbidden to establish “security trusts” for their own community, yet the CST garner immense support from government and we the tax-payer fund it to some degree.

Their main funding though appears to come from really quite strange foundations, so-called charitable trusts, which are in effect merely shields to disguise their true funding, in fact investigating the CST is for the moment quite difficult given that unlike other “charities” (sic) the CST operate under a veil of secrecy. There is a statement upon their own website as to their purpose, yet this stated purpose is forbidden to any other community, none of us are permitted the same freedom least of all with police backing, in fact there are many cases, whereby groups set up to protect their own communities, have at best been disparaged and at worst actively broken up, yet the CST is permitted to operate.

CST believes that the fight against antisemitism and terrorism is vital to help ensure a vibrant Jewish community, and in safeguarding democratic British society against extremism and hatred.

CST provides physical security, training and advice for the protection of British Jews. CST assists victims of antisemitism and monitors antisemitic activities and incidents. CST represents British Jewry to Police, Government and media on antisemitism and security. CST has a proud heritage dating back to the Jewish defence organisations formed in the 1930s to combat Oswald Mosley and his followers. Today the principal threats to the community are terrorism and antisemitic attacks.

“As the Jewish community’s only defence organisation CST has grown significantly. We now have four offices and 55 members of staff. CST is a registered charity whose work is provided entirely without charge and is solely funded by donations from the Jewish community.

The ethos of CST is that the Jewish community is responsible for its own security. CST draws upon a network of 3,000 trained volunteers throughout the country. They are at the heart of the organisation and come from all spheres of communal life, regardless of religious observance, political beliefs, age or gender. These personnel are trained by CST, and by the Police, so that they can provide the highest level of security for the Jewish community”.

The above is from their own website, it is a statement of purpose an illegal purpose to you and me but sanctioned for them, further I would dispute that the CST is “the

”CST draws upon a network of 3,000 trained volunteers throughout the country. They are at the heart of the organisation and come from all spheres of communal life, regardless of religious observance, political beliefs, age or gender. These personnel are trained by CST, and by the Police, so that they can provide the highest level of security for the Jewish community”

Jewish community’s only defence organisation”, given that we are meant to have equality under the law (sic) and we have an established police force, apparently this is not enough for certain communities, communities given special status within UK law. I suggest you try it, endeavour to set up a “security trust”, inform the authorities, set up a website and ask for training and funding from central government ,I am sure you will be shown the door quite soon.
Moreover this organisation is so secretive that determining just how and by whom it is sourced is extremely difficult and it is beyond doubt, that such a secretive organisation would in fact make funding sources available to the general public. Of course officially it employs some 64 full time staff, although lets face it can we ever know, it has some 3000 volunteers, yes you read it right 3000 volunteers, “almost a political party in its own right” or a small army, yet again, given the secrecy surrounding this organisation we have to take at face value the claim that there are only 3000 members.

It has to be realised that if this is the public admission then there must be considerably more, all working solely for their community, which rather put the “we’re all the same” rubbish to bed doesn’t it. Quite frighteningly and indeed unusually for a charity the Community Security Trust has according to the Charity Commission itself:

“This charity has been given a dispensation by the Charity Commission from publishing the names of its trustees”.

Scary isn’t it we have a well-funded, state endorsed paramilitary organisation upon UK soil and no-one bats an eye, in fact the police and security services aid such an organisation, train its members and in fact work in many cases in tandem. For instance, we know that the NSPCC has Dame Denise Platt DBE, SIR Christopher Kelly, Rob Hutchinson CBE and others among its trustees, yet when it comes to this organisation there is special “dispensation”, I’m sorry but something stinks and quite badly.

This organisation is funded in the millions, in the financial year ending 31 Mar 2008 the CST recording its income as £144,896,358 and its outgoings as £146,313,542, this in itself is huge yet one can imagine that this is merely the tip of the iceberg. Israel itself must donate large sums of money hiding much behind those self-same “foundations” and as we know submitted accounts are not always true accounts, yet given again the secrecy, the fact that trustees are not mentioned it is almost impossible to establish true funding. If for instance the names of trustees were made available then one could come to a better understanding of overall income, which is exactly the reason such information is not nor ever will be made available.

So there we have it, a well-trained, Para-military force established upon UK soil with the connivance of the state and indeed the conservative opposition, an organisation that is not by any means all inclusive that exists to preserve and protect one community. There are of course those within nationalism, who still persist with the “they are our friends rubbish”, my enemies enemy is my friend, so they say, yet this community perhaps of all others, attacks nationalism with a vengeance, harries it, smears it and physically inhibits its growth .Many far-left organisations have been or are supported by Jewry and it has been only in recent years, that there has been a break between leftists and Jewry.

Many Jews stand quite bravely against Judaic supremacist thought, they condemn the rogue state of Israel and stand on the side of truth, yet even this is a hypocrisy given that such individuals advocate (quite rightly) for Palestinian freedoms, yet would deny whites the same privilege. Below are some of the Charities contributing money to this Militia, it is a far from complete list, understandably given the shadows that surround this group, it would seem that rather than supporting its people successive governments have curtailed our freedoms and supported foreign interests, interests wholly alien to our national our genetic interest.

List of Donors (the ones they permit us to know about)

Kirschel Foundation £2,500 [Community Service Trust]
Morris Leigh Foundation [unspecified]
Acacia Trust [£5,000]
The Alliance Family Foundation [£39,000]
Arbib Foundation [£5,000]
The Ardwick Trust [unspecified]
The Baker Charitable Trust [unspecified]
The Bertie Black Foundation [unspecified]
The Sir Victor Blank Charitable Settlement [£30,000]
David Blank Donations Ltd. [unspecified]
The Neville & Elaine Blond Charitable Trust [£8,000]
The Bonamy Charitable Trust [£4,000]
The M Bourne Charitable trust [£500]
The R M Burton 1998 Charitable Settlement [£10,000]
The Carlton House Charitable Trust [£1,000]
The Carroll Marx Charitable Foundation [£4,500]
The Denise Cohen Charitable Trust [£2,000]
The John S Cohen Charitable Trust [£5,000]
The Muriel & Gershon Coren Charitable Trust [£4,000]
The Sydney & Elizabeth Corob Charitable Trust [£2,500]
The Steven & Sheila Crown Charitable Trust [unspecified]
Datnow Limited [£1,750]
The Richard Desmond Charitable Trust [£15,000]
Alan and Sheila Diamond Charitable Trust [unspecified]
The Djanogly Foundation [£2,000]
The George Elias Charitable Trust [£6,000]
The Eventhall Family Charitable Trust [unspecified]
The Exilarch’s Foundation [£1,000]
The Family Foundations Trust/The Mintz Family Foundation [unspecified]
The Gerald Fogel Charitable Trust [£2,500]
The Garrard Education Trust Ltd. [£15,000]
The Joseph & Queenie Gold Charitable Trust [£500]
The GRP Charitable Trust [£3,000]
The H & J Spack Charitable Trust [£1,500]
The J & J Charitable Trust [£10,000]
The Maurice Hatter Foundation [£17,000]
Heathside Charitable Trust [£25,000]
J I Charitable Trust [£50,000]
The Jackson’s Charitable Trust [£5,000]
Jacobs Charitable Trust [£20,000]
The Yvette & Hermione Jacobson Charitable Trust [£3,100]
Susan and Stephen James Charitable Settlement (Stephen James Ch. Trust) [£6,500]
The N B Johnson Charitable Settlement [£3,000]
The Joron Charitable Trust [£10,000]
The Ian Karten Charitable Trust [£900]
The Michael and Ilse Katz Foundation [unspecified]
The C D Korn Charitable Trust [£300]
The Lauffer Family Charitable Foundation [£3,000]
The Kennedy Leigh Charitable Trust [£30,000 over 3 years]
The Maisie & Raphael Lewis Charitable Trust [£2,500]
The Ruth & Stuart Lipton Charitable Trust [£10,500]
Jack Livingstone Charitable Trust [£5,000]
The Lowy Mitchell Foundation [unspecified]
The Sir Jack Lyons Charitable Trust [£1,000]
Malcolm Lyons Charitable Foundation [£2,000]
The M and C Trust [unspecified]
Normalyn Charitable Trust [£1,000]
The Phillips Family Charitable Trust [£5,000]
The Joseph & Lena Randall Charitable Trust [£2,500]
The Fanny Rapaport Charitable Settlement [unspecified]
The Rayden Charitable Trust [£1,250]
Reuben Brothers Foundation [£20,000]
The Rubin Foundation [£25,000]
The Michael Sacher Charitable Trust [£5,000]
Basil Samuel Charitable Trust [£40,000]
The Peter Samuel Charitable Trust [£2,000]
The Schmidt Bodner Charitable Trust [£5,000]
The Sears Foundation [£2,000]
The Solo Charitable Settlement [£14,000]
The Cyril & Betty Stein Charitable Trust [£500]
The Steinberg Family Charitable Trust [£10,000]
The Stoller Charitable Trust [£7,500]
The Tangent Charitable Trust [unspecified]
The Weinberg Foundation [£10,000]
The Weinstock Fund [£10,000]
The Weldon UK Charitable Trust [£1,000]
The Maurice Wohl Charitable Foundation [£5,000]
David Young Charitable Trust [£7,000]

Total £529,800 64 charities with 14 unspecified sources

Web ‘boosting hate speech’, says CST

The Community Security Trust claims that society is entering "dangerous territory" as extremists are increasingly using newspaper websites to reach wider audiences. 

Most newspapers, as well as broadcasters, have areas on their websites which provide open forums, allowing members of the public to create a blog or their own page. 

The CST said this week that an increasingly large number of extremists were using such media outlets, giving them platforms with huge audiences through which to air their views. 

One example is Richard Barnbook, the British National Party's London Assembly member, who has created a blog on the Daily Telegraph website, telegraph.co.uk. 

Mark Gardner, director of communications at the CST, said: "Freedom of speech is not an absolute right where racists and extremists are concerned. 

"It is important that responsible mainstream media outlets, such as the Daily Telegraph, take great care for whom they are providing a platform." 

He stressed that Mr Barnbrook's blog was not an isolated trend and said that many newspapers and broadcasters such as The Guardian and the BBC had had their websites "utilised for the promotion of extremism and race hatred". 

Although the CST is not calling for a ban on BNP representation in the media, it has said that when the party's supporters are given space in newspapers or on television, media outlets must ensure that readers and viewers are fully aware of who they are and the nature of their views. 

Mr Gardner warned that this was a complex and growing issue which "society as a whole has not yet fully come to grips with" and said that policies needed to be implemented to deal with it. 

"This is an issue that the CST has repeatedly flagged up in recent years and is something we have repeatedly raised in our conversations with MPs and government ministers," he said. 

At The Guardian, the editor of the Comment Is Free section, Matt Seaton, said: "We have a zero-tolerance policy on antisemitic postings or any other form of hate speech. 

"We devote considerable and growing resources to moderating out site, with the help of our users. 

"We do not tolerate any hate speech, and our moderators will delete comments which are antisemitic or Islamophobic or otherwise racist , as soon as they are reported to us or when we see them ourselves. That happens in minutes rather than hours or days. 

"We are very well aware that one should never be complacent about antisemitism in the public domain or other forms of racist discourse and we work very hard to tackle the issue and to keep racist commenting off our site." 

A spokesman for the Telegraph Group declined to comment on Mr Barnbrook's blog posts.

Examples of prejudice on media sites

  

A post on The Guardian's Comment Is Free section under the title "ItsAllLies" in July 2007 said: "Jewish people control the Western world. Of course they will use that control to get away with anything...That is what Jews are about. Taking control of people... If they did this back in 1940, no wonder Hitler started a war. Is that a bad thing to say? A man who saw his country taken over by a certain group of people who think only of themselves and screw everyone else, decides to take back his country and stop those people from using the countries around him to mount attacks on him? [sic]"

Posted on the BBC website by "Jamie, Croydon": "If you read the Protocols of the Elders of Zion you'll see plans for the domination of the entire Middle East by Zionists. Worried? We should all be, the plans are already afoot. Israel by its arrogance will drag us all into WWIII." continues here

Police to probe bus ‘outburst’

A bus driver is alleged to have shouted abusive comments at mourners at the funeral of Britain's longest-serving minister. 

Over 400 people attended the funeral of the Rev Leslie Olsberg, minister at Heaton Park Synagogue, last Sunday at Rainsough Cemetery in Prestwich. 

Some of those present said that when the driver of the 93 bus could not get through the crowds, he wound down his window and began shouting insults. One mourner claimed the driver shouted: "You people think you own everything." 

The incident was reported to the Community Security Trust who then reported it to Greater Manchester Police. They have now launched an investigation.

A spokesman for the CST said: "There were lots of people and lots of cars and the bus couldn't get through. 

"I understand the driver shouted words to that effect and that many people heard it." 

A Greater Manchester police spokeswoman confirmed that the alleged incident had been reported and added: "Officers are investigating the exact nature of the complaint, and take all such incidents where a hate incident could have occurred very seriously. Inquiries are ongoing." continues here