Jewish groups oppose abortion amendment

WASHINGTON (JTA) -- Three Jewish organizations are opposing an amendment to House health care legislation restricting federal funding of abortion.

The National Council of Jewish Women, the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism and the American Jewish Congress say the provision should be taken out of the bill.

The amendment bans any government funds from going toward abortion except in the cases of rape, incest and when the mother's life is in danger. It prohibits anyone who receives a government subsidy to buy insurance from purchasing a plan that includes abortion.

NCJW said the bill "does not fully meet women's health care needs" because of the "draconian" provision, which it called an "egregious assault on the rights of women and an enormous step backward for those who believe in the separation of religion and state." continues here

Editorial : Without wishing to attract criticism from the new-right or judeo-nationalists, I have to say that Jewry has always been very pro-baby-killing; in fact if one looks back to the very origins of the “women’s movement”, at its advocates and activists, one finds a disproportionably high number of individuals of this particular faith. Is faith the right word, given that this group consider themselves firstly a people and secondly a belief system, in any event, it comes as no surprise to this nationalist writer, that Jewry opposes such an amendment, it would seem that for some groups the death of the innocents is to be pursued…

New laws could mean children disappear from TV, say broadcasters

Children could disappear from our television screens if the Government decides to press ahead with plans to tighten regulations covering their appearance in entertainment, broadcasters claim.

The Department for Children, Schools and Families is putting the finishing touches to proposals aimed at clarifying the rules governing reality shows such as Britain’s Got Talent and Boys and Girls Alone, which campaigners claim can cause children unnecessary distress.

The television industry is braced for a fierce battle with children’s charities and the Government over the proposals, which will suggest that programme makers must obtain a licence from a local council virtually every time they want to include a child in a television show. Councils also want the power to do spot checks on production sets.

The department originally intended to publish proposals last week, but last-minute submissions by broadcasters have forced it to delay. The head of one production company said: “You’ve got a whole range of people who want a super-nanny state where kids aren’t even allowed to watch television, let alone work on it. This debate will be acrimonious, to say the least.”

Legislation covering children in the entertainment industry, which has not been updated for more than 40 years, states that under-16s must be licensed if they take time out of school, or are paid, to “perform” — widely interpreted as singing, acting or dancing.

While this already covers drama and talent shows, it is understood that the Government will suggest widening the licensing requirements to include factual programmes and reality shows. Broadcasters say that forcing them to apply for permission to feature children in documentaries will give local authorities political powers to veto programmes they do not agree with.

British children’s programming is already under threat after ITV, Channel 4 and Five reduced spending by 70 per cent between 2004 and 2008. But producers fear that having to go through a 21-day licensing process to allow children to appear in shows such as Blue Peter would be unworkable.

The chief executive of a production company behind a string of children’s programmes said: “British content for British children will all be gone if this is implemented. You wouldn’t see kids on television, you will just see American imports. It is hugely ironic because the areas that they’re trying to save are the ones that they will kill.”

The Government has been talking to campaigners for years about its plans to update the law, but the debate has been crystallised after a Channel 4 documentary shown in February, Boys and Girls Alone, featured 20 primary schoolchildren in a house without adult supervision for two weeks.

Child psychologists claimed that the programme, in which the youngsters were shown fighting and dissolving into tears, was tantamount to child abuse. Under current legislation, the broadcaster did not need to get a licence from a local council, as the show did not constitute a “performance”. The most recent series of Britain’s Got Talent, which showed Hollie Steel, 10, breaking down in tears after forgetting the words to her song, also drew complaints from campaigners. continues here

Pupils told: Sex every day keeps the GP away

A National Health Service leaflet is advising school pupils that they have a “right” to an enjoyable sex life and that regular intercourse can be good for their cardiovascular health.

The advice appears in guidance circulated to parents, teachers and youth workers, and is intended to update sex education by telling pupils about the benefits of they have as much right as an adult to a good sex life.sexual pleasure. For too long, say its authors, experts have concentrated on the need for “safe sex” and loving relationships while ignoring the main reason that many people have sex, that is, for enjoyment.

The document, called Pleasure, has been drawn up by NHS Sheffield, although it is also being circulated outside the city.

Alongside the slogan “an orgasm a day keeps the doctor away”, it says: “Health promotion experts advocate five portions of fruit and veg a day and 30 minutes’ physical activity three times a week. What about sex or masturbation twice a week?”

Steve Slack, director of the Centre for HIV and Sexual Health at NHS Sheffield, who is one of the authors, argues that, far from promoting teenage sex, it could encourage young people to delay losing their virginity until they are sure they will enjoy the experience. continues here

Slack

It is apt I suppose that one of the authors names is slack ,given that, that is the morality he wishes to promote, it is telling also, that he works for the Centre for HIV and Sexual Health at NHS Sheffield, it would seem that seeing daily the affects of “slack morality” has had no bearing. Can not our children be children, why must we drive them as a herd towards adulthood, why must we shorten innocence which is such a precious thing, today morality is classed as repressive however under this so-called repressed morality did we not prosper, was not our nation the most powerful upon the planet, were we not admired for our “stiff upper lip” our detachment.

Culling

Certainly we need as a matter of urgency to higher our birth-rates, we need to replicate in order to survive, yet egalitarians and leftists, advocates of degeneracy also advocate wholesale slaughter of the innocent, so to tell the immature that sex is merely for entertainment is akin to sanctioning pain, suffering and ultimately murder. Abortion is murder, no ifs no buts, we can collectively ignore the plight of these innocents or recognise that leftists and their ilk are culling us wholesale, if one listens to their argument one finds really quite easily, that they are all a sham, immigrants come here because there are not enough working age people paying tax, they say, yet can that be because we have spent some decades now, killing them in their mothers womb.

Sexualised

They wax lyrical about the threat from sexually transmitted diseases, yet promote low morality, under-age sex and homosexuality, under their watch, our numbers are unsustainable for future growth, young children, mainly girls, are sexualised before their prime, the age of consent for homosexuality has been lowered and teenage-girls have children in hopes of a home. Our streets are no longer safe as predators roam and paedophilia is seemingly at epic proportions, divorce skyrockets and marriage is unfashionable, in comparison to earlier times we are a failed society, are we not.

A return to morality

Nationalism urges a return to morality, it seeks to once again create boundaries, of primary importance is the protection of women and children, for this reason any nationalist government will seek to make the streets safe as a first priority, further children will simply enjoy being children and no promotion of a sexual livestyle will occur be it heterosexual or indeed homosexual, on the matter of homosexuality, which is a bugbear for the nationalist movement. Homosexuality should never under any circumstance be promoted, adults have the perfect right to personal privacy within their own homes and there have always been homosexuals, this does not mean that we should sanction it, equalise it or promote it.

Leave our children alone!!

Quite troublingly it would appear that there is and has been an agenda towards our most precious resource children, one need only look to the fashions sold to our young girls or read magazines aimed at them to realise the threat, further as we can see from the above article, there is pressure to rob them of childhood and propel them into the adult world of sexuality, coupled with this is the lowering of the age of consent for homosexuality, which is deplorable given that many young adults suffer confusion as to their sexual direction. All in all the leftist approach is malicious, aimed at serving their agenda at the expense of our children ,there is nothing wrong with sex, yet plenty wrong with low morality within society, leave our children alone!!

CHILDREN SUFFER AS TRADITIONAL FAMILIES VANISH

Almost 40 per cent of British children are not living with married parents by the time they start school.

The high teenage pregnancy rate is being blamed for the growing number brought up by single mothers. 

Just 63 per cent of youngsters are in “traditional” family groups at the age of five, according to a study of 15,000 youngsters born in the first two years of the millennium. 

That means 37 per cent are not living with a married mother and father at home together. 

The research also found the proportion residing with both parents – whether married or not – had fallen from 86 per cent to 77 per cent since they were first surveyed at nine months old. 

Most of this decline was due to a sharp fall in those living with cohabiting mothers and fathers – down from 24 per cent then to 14 per cent. 

The number of children being brought up by single mothers rose from 14 to 17 per cent in the same period. 

Critics of the decline of the two-parent family called for Labour to re-think its disdain of marriage.

Research has shown that youngsters born outside wedlock face a higher risk of failing at school, suffering poor health and of going on to face problems with unemployment, drugs and crime. 

Jill Kirby, of the centre-right think-tank Centre for Policy Studies, said: “These figures show that the expectation that marriage will precede childbirth is disappearing from British life. 

“It is a matter of great concern,” she said, adding that there was urgent need to change the welfare system to make marriage a more attractive option. 

Study author Professor Shirley Dex, of the University of London’s Institute of Education, said: “These findings provide justification for policies to improve alternatives to early motherhood for the least educated young women. They also imply that young single mothers, who are still least likely to be employed, may benefit from further targeted support from government.” 

Government figures have shown that children who live with both parents improve their GCSE performance almost twice as fast as classmates living with just their mothers. continues here

 

Children as young as three should be reported for 'racism', Government-funded group claims

Toddlers should be taught about racism and singled out for criticism if they have racist attitudes, a Government-funded advisory group said yesterday. 

It told nursery teachers, playgroup leaders and childminders to record and report every racist incident involving children as young as three. 

These could include saying 'Yuk' about unfamiliar food.

Even babies should not be ignored in the hunt for racism because they can 'recognise different people in their lives', a new guide for nurseries and child care centres said.

The instructions for staff in charge of pre-school children in day care have been produced by the National Children's Bureau, which receives £12million a year, mostly through taxpayer-funded organisations. 

The NCB, which describes itself as 'an umbrella body for the children's sector', has long used its resources to campaign on controversial issues, for example in favour of a legal ban on smacking by parents. 

It also runs the Sex Education Forum, a campaign for more sex education in schools. 

The new 366-page guide, Young Children and Racial Justice, warned that 'racist incidents among children in early years settings-tend to be around name-calling-casual thoughtless comments, and peer group relationships'. 

It said such incidents could include children using words like 'blackie', 'Pakis', 'those people' or 'they smell'. 

Children might also 'react negatively to a culinary tradition other than their own by saying "yuk".' 

Nursery staff are told: 'No racist incident should be ignored. When there is a clear racist intent, it is necessary to be specific in condemning the action.' 

If children 'reveal negative attitudes the lack of censure may indicate to the child that there is nothing unacceptable about such attitudes'. 

Nurseries are encouraged to report as many racist incidents as possible to local councils. 

'Some people think that if a large number of racist incidents are reported, this will reflect badly on the institution,' it said. 'In fact, the opposite is the case.' 

The guidance said that anyone who disagrees is racist themselves. continues here

Are you awake yet, do you even care, it doesn’t seem you do, you continue on with your life whilst they destroy us, we are marked for extinction and unless we challenge it now they will win. Our children, or if we last that long, our grandchildren face an appalling future, a future where they are the minority, they the alien in their natural homelands, do you think for one second, that non-whites will exhibit the same degree of empathy, if not sheer capitulation, we have shown, do you think whites will be granted any concessions, the simple answer is no. We can see already the intolerance for the west these new-comers show, all it takes is for you to stand up and say enough, to show the leftists and their reprehensible backers that, they have had their day. To strive for something more than self, to try to heal this country, how in all conscious can you stand idly by, whilst they indoctrinate your own children, whilst they corrupt the innocent.

What ideology is it that requires such draconian enforcement, quite simply a wrong one, if multiculturalism was the benefit they tell you it is, why then the need for thought police, the need for laws, the need for anti-white-discrimination, why the need to besiege the minds of our most precious possession, our children, truly this is an evil ideology. Yet I stand amazed, amazed and appalled because you the people let them do it, you let them ride roughshod over your right to exist and your freedoms, you let them destroy western civilisation without a whimper, without even a cursory glance. You hold within you the power to change this, the power to alter and resist their evil plans, without you all of you who read this we cannot win, we simply cannot put right all the wrongs without a mandate from the people. We can talk a good fight, we can debate the issues but we cannot, simply cannot heal this nation and others, without a united effort, without you.

It should be the ultimate taboo the one thing that forces us to draw a line in the sand and shout no, no more, we simply refuse you, we will no longer bow down to your rubbish, to your garbage, to your filthy lies, leave our children alone. You have broken the family, lowered standards, attacked the unborn, pilloried white males, forced women into the workplace, taxed us for others, lied to us, made our society less caring and more violent, ruined everything but leave our children alone. The left should be running in fear, surrounded by the chaos of rage, harried back to whichever hellhole they came from, they should never again be permitted to preach their vile gospel, their evil philosophy and we, we survivors should begin anew to repair the damage they have caused. We should bring light back in, where once darkness flourished we should above all protect children, the rights of the child should be paramount to all after all they are our future.

Instead you won’t change, you won’t lift as much as a finger, you will remain so caught up with self that, you will sacrifice their future, hand them over on a plate, give their tomorrows, so you can have today. We are no longer what we were, we have been changed, altered, we have become monsters, caring for nothing but ourselves, we have thrown away our greatest strength, our unique altruism, a selflessness that enabled us to build the worlds only lasting society, the worlds foremost civilisation, but no longer. It is over, finished, we have succumb to savagery, we are a mere shadow of what we once were, evolution set in reverse, as the savage we admire shiny objects bedecked in gold, caring more for a label than for a child. We import dissimilar people to make up the numbers, as we kill our own in the womb; we banish our old, out of sight and presumably out of mind, to institutions to whither and simply die. We place minority over majority, lauding stupidity whilst deriding intellect, we admire violence, dishonesty and disrespect and teach our children these traits, and we are so unhappy that, many stagger bleary-eyed through life, high on drugs or alcohol or both. The law of the jungle has returned and all are prey, the flash of a knife and life is over, we creep around fearfully or find safety in a group, the power of the parent lies shattered and broken, a once valued antique. They have destroyed us, altered our very society, look around you for the better, do you prefer this, this incremental extinction, this erosion of good, this perversion, this malevolence.

Is it some sort of mind-numbing madness, some illusionists trick, do you not see, not hear, does anger not fuel your engine and sorrow not set your sail, do you not fence with reason and find yourself wanting. Do you contort as a gymnast avoiding all taboos, striving to comply with all they want, never realising that the exercise is over, the competition run and it is they that were wrong, they that have failed however, they won’t admit it, despotism is forever stubborn. Despotism, tyranny, can never be gently lathered away, never be sedately swept, it must be scrubbed until the flesh of society is red, until every vestige of filth is washed away. Yet although they have failed their lies still hold you true, the glue of madness binds your freedom and the bars of repression steal the future, it is coming, hold on tight, you may live to see the evil you permitted entrance, the demon you refused to contain. You may live to see the fear in your children’s eyes mixed with anger at your inaction; you may live to regret not fighting when chance came calling, when the merest glimmer of hope shone brightly.

If you can stand aside as they take your children, if you can watch unperturbed, perhaps you deserve your fate, perhaps I am wrong and there is nothing left to fight for. Perhaps the struggle is over and evil has the field, perhaps I should succumb as you have, caught in their web of lies, perhaps I should never again look to my fellows or strive for our children’s tomorrow. Perhaps the cow truly jumps over the moon, the yellow brick road truly leads to Oz and there is gold at the end of the rainbow, perhaps we are all equal and leftist philosophy is benign, perhaps tyranny doesn’t augment and money grows on trees, perhaps I can turn about and leave all I love to die, perhaps I am you. 14

White children most likely to be bullied

“Whites are becoming more aggressive than they used to be as a result of trying to intergrate into a new society norm that is so aggressive. They have changed the way they behave in order to survive.”

White children are much more likely to be bullied than any other ethnic group - reversing racial stereotypes surrounding playground abuse, Government research indicates. 

Two thirds of children from white families say they had been bullied in the last three years but less than half of children of Indian origin make the same assertion. 

Anti-bullying campaigners say white children are now in the minority in some areas raising their chances of being bullied. 

Claude Knights, director of anti-bullying charity Kidscape, said:“More and more we’re hearing that in some cities it isn’t the usual isolation of ethnic groups, suddenly we have got statistics that show we have got a larger number of white young people being bullied.

“In some cities there’s a dislocation of certain white children. So many cultures around them are being celebrated but where’s their place? There’s been such an attempt that you don’t forget what has come in to the system that what was there already has been forgotten.” This isolation makes children feel “different” she said, and was likely to lead to them being bullied. 

Six in ten children of black Caribbean origin said they had experienced bullying in the last three years, according to research into 16-year-olds by the Department for Children Schools and Families(DCSF). The results indicated that 58 per cent of children from Pakistani backgrounds and 54 per cent of those with Bangladeshi roots had been victims of bullies. continues here